Türgi Armee(Armeeni ja Venelased tapsid Aseri)

Korea, Vietnam, Lähis-Ida, Afganistan. Kõik konfliktid. Kui seal on olnud eestlasi, siis seda enam.
Kasutaja avatar
turk
Liige
Postitusi: 137
Liitunud: 06 Juul, 2008 12:49
Kontakt:

Türgi Armee(Armeeni ja Venelased tapsid Aseri)

Postitus Postitas turk »

Türgi armee sait seda: http://www.tsk.mil.tr/

Armeeni vabariik on seotud venelasega et venelased jättisid KAUKASIAS,Armeenlased hoiasid 1.maailmasõjal Tsaaree venelasi,armeeni ja venelased oli vastu OSMANI(OTTOMANI) EMPERI,,praegu armeeni teevad propagandit et võtta Türgist endale maa,,armeeni teevad propagandit nii;mida armeenlased esimese jeesus(kristusi),mida Türklased on Moslim,tapsid meid,aidake meile,,

ARMEENI Vabariik istub kaukasias VENEMAA jaoks,Venemaa sõdurit istuvad Armeenis

TÜRGI ARMEE
Pilt
Pilt
Pilt
Pilt
Pilt
Pilt
Pilt
Pilt


meie kangelane on ATATÜRK pilt
Pilt
Kasutaja avatar
turk
Liige
Postitusi: 137
Liitunud: 06 Juul, 2008 12:49
Kontakt:

Armeenlased ja Venelased Tapsid Aseri Karabagi

Postitus Postitas turk »

Venelased hoiatavad Armeeni et VENEMAA jättis KAUKASIAS,tõttu Venemaa tegi probleeeme Gruzi PEALE:ABHASIA JA OSETIA,Venemaa tegi probleemi ASERI peale KARABAGI MÄGI,sest kuna sõda on,siis VENEMAA jäätab Kaukasias

KARA BAG,SEDA on Aseri keelt,armeeni keeles ei ole KARABAG sõna

vaadake video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loizHeP1 ... re=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOkNPl73 ... re=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Rwp8uCg ... re=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHu4ubdg ... re=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKgkVv1G ... re=related

Armeeni terorist ASALA tapsid palju Türklasi suursadik ja palju normaalselt inimesi,,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6TOKw95 ... re=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0J-U1Gv_vU



kirjutage googles ARMENIAN TERRORISM ,te näete kõik info,,

armeenlased teevad propagandit eriti näitavad oma Jeesus usku,et te usute neisse,sest praegu ANTIMUSLIM propagandit väga hea sobib...


ARMEENI JA VENEMAA ON barbaries vabariiki


kes neid armeenlased,kuid te hakkate tundma vaadake seda sait

http://www.armenianreality.com/
Charlemagne
Liige
Postitusi: 1483
Liitunud: 12 Juun, 2005 18:33
Kontakt:

Postitus Postitas Charlemagne »

Kui tänapäeva Türgi soldatid kõik sellised on, nagu seal esimesel pildil lipu taustal, siis tahaks minagi vabatahtlikult Türgi armeessse astuda :D
Üsna kauge aeg ja kauge kant see Armeenia ja Türgimaa.... Viimasel ajal on armeenlased oma genotsiidijutu tublisti üles võtnud.Midagi kurja see Talaat-pasha siis ikka tegi, kui sellest niipalju juttu. Türgitõnnide suhtes jällegi ....noh elasid need armeenlased Otomani impeeriumis mitusada aastat ja erilisi probleeme polnud - Türgi sultaniriik oli teiseusuliste vastu küllaltki salliv ja igasugune rassism oli tundmatu asi. Kui märuliks läks türgimaal, siis ikka maksude pärast. Mis siis järsku nende armeenlastega hakkas?
Üks oluline asi ajaloos on meelest kahjuks ära läinud Euroopas ja see ei tee sugugi au meile. Nimelt, et peale I MS. taheti türklaste maa päris ära jagada euroopa võitjariikide vahel. Eriti maiad olid Kreeka ja Itaalia. Ja poleks Kemal-pasha ehk siis Atatürgi riigimehetarkust ja sõjameheoskust, oleks türgi poistel kuri karjas. Paraku sai Türgist hoopiski euroopalik riik suurte valudega küll aga Atatürk võttis asja südamega. Kreeklaste väljakihutamine oma vanadelt aladelt Väike-Aasias on küll tõsiasi, aga täielikult Kreeka ahne ja lolli poliitika tulemus.
Et notre Parole s'appelle Fidélité !
donnervetter
Liige
Postitusi: 171
Liitunud: 28 Juun, 2007 21:36
Kontakt:

Postitus Postitas donnervetter »

Mis värk ja hala, turk(id) on rünnakule asunud vä?
[i]Kui sa oled sattunud ihuüksi keset ääretut kõrbe ja sul on ainult pool liitrit vett, siis ära heida meelt.
Sul jätkub sellest elu lõpuni![/i]
Charlemagne
Liige
Postitusi: 1483
Liitunud: 12 Juun, 2005 18:33
Kontakt:

Postitus Postitas Charlemagne »

Turkide rünnakut pole siin kusagil. Igaühel on õigus oma ajalugu tutvustada ja seletada nii, nagu tema seda näeb. Rahulikult, palun. Seni ollakse vast rohkem armeenia poolt kuuldud, lase Türgi selgitab oma seisukohti. Igaljuhul tore on, et meil foorumil nüüd ka üks Türgi soost mees on!
Et notre Parole s'appelle Fidélité !
Kasutaja avatar
turk
Liige
Postitusi: 137
Liitunud: 06 Juul, 2008 12:49
Kontakt:

Postitus Postitas turk »

Charlemagne kirjutas:Turkide rünnakut pole siin kusagil. Igaühel on õigus oma ajalugu tutvustada ja seletada nii, nagu tema seda näeb. Rahulikult, palun. Seni ollakse vast rohkem armeenia poolt kuuldud, lase Türgi selgitab oma seisukohti. Igaljuhul tore on, et meil foorumil nüüd ka üks Türgi soost mees on!
kallis sõber, armeenlased teevad propagandit euroopas venemaal ameerikas, esiemese neil on propagandit ANTIMUSLIM, palju inimesi religioni eest usuvad neisse,

kui üks armeenlane ütleb TÜRKLASED ON MUSLIM, terorist, tapsid meid, inimesed kiiresti usuvad neisse.. sest antimuslim propagandit väga hea sobib


mõtled enne 90 aastat oli 1.maailmasõjal, armeenlased ja venelased sõdurit oli vastu Ottomani emperi, meie kangelane ATATÜRK võitus neid

pärast 50 aastat nad ütlevad genocid

pärast 2.maailmasäjast eriti hakkasid ütlema genocid sest armeenlased tahavad saada kuidas IISRAIL

IISRAIL genocid eest saavad SAKSLASTELT palju raha ja kõik kaebavad neid,mida iisrail on surnud


vaat armeenlased diaspora ka tahab saada niisama...

kõik on valesti


ajaloos palju genocid oli, näiteks STALIN AJASID kõik Eestlasi siberis, palju Eestlasi on surnud, miks siis ei ütle genocid?


ARMEENI istub venemaa eest KAUKASIAS, ARMEENIS ON VENEMAA SÕDURIT


palun vaadake video : Venemaa armee on armeenis,KES SAAB ARU VENE KEELT, vaadake venemaa armee on armeenis, sest venemaa ei taha lahkuda KAUKASIAST, venemaa tahab jälle teha venemaa emperi,tõttu alati teevad sõda kaukasias et armeeni aseri gruzi jätsid venemaa all,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noqMHlYY ... re=related



Gumri linna venemaa sõdurit ,,,euroopas pärast 11 semtember terorizm ameerikas,inimesed hakkasid uskuma armeenisse ,sest propagandit ANTIMUSLIM väga hea sobib,



mõtlete? 1915.aastat oli sõda,1945.aastat ka oli sõda,enne ka oli sõda, pärast 90 aastat ütlevad genocid et saada türgist maa

ma arvan nad on naised,kui nad tahavad türgist maa,ütlevad meile kuidas mehed, :wink:
UURALI-ALTAI Rahvast-Turanian People(Estonia,Turkey,Finlandia,Karelian,Hungarian,Tatarstan,Komi,Mariel,Udmurt,
Turkmenistan,uigur,Mongolia,Kirgis,Kazakstan,Ösbek,Gagausia,Aseri,Kumik,Kipchak,Mansi,Nenets,Sami)Uralic-Altay people
Lemet
Liige
Postitusi: 19939
Liitunud: 12 Apr, 2006 15:49
Kontakt:

Postitus Postitas Lemet »

Hm, raskel nõukogude ajal käisin kordi Armeenias. Suur rahvaste sõprus jne, aga armeenlased pajatasid ikkagi, kuis türklased neid sajandi algul tapsid.Ja islami pealetungist ei räägitud siis küll sõnagi. Ning tapeti mitte kümneid ega sadu, vaid kordades rohkem. Kuis sellega lugupeetud foorumlase turki vaatevinklist on? Armeenlaste seisukohta olen ma juba kuulnud. Või oli kõik armeenlaste kallal kordasaadetu normaalne ja seaduspärane?? Ja armeenia rahvas peab olema suurele türgi rahvale siiralt ja sügavalt tänulik abi eest rahvaarvu reguleerimise küsimustes...
Errare humanum est-aga veel inimlikum on selle teise kraesse väänamine...
Kasutaja avatar
turk
Liige
Postitusi: 137
Liitunud: 06 Juul, 2008 12:49
Kontakt:

Postitus Postitas turk »

Lemet kirjutas:Hm, raskel nõukogude ajal käisin kordi Armeenias. Suur rahvaste sõprus jne, aga armeenlased pajatasid ikkagi, kuis türklased neid sajandi algul tapsid.Ja islami pealetungist ei räägitud siis küll sõnagi. Ning tapeti mitte kümneid ega sadu, vaid kordades rohkem. Kuis sellega lugupeetud foorumlase turki vaatevinklist on? Armeenlaste seisukohta olen ma juba kuulnud. Või oli kõik armeenlaste kallal kordasaadetu normaalne ja seaduspärane?? Ja armeenia rahvas peab olema suurele türgi rahvale siiralt ja sügavalt tänulik abi eest rahvaarvu reguleerimise küsimustes...

mmmmm sina olid armeenis tõttu sulle meeldis kõik armeenlased ja sina ütled ERITI TÜRKLASED MUSLIM tapsid kõik armeenlased,mmmmmmmm
kas sina nägid? kui kas sina oled inimene vaata üle video ma kirjutasin üleval palju video,kes tapsid keegi ,,,,SINU LEMMIK ARMEENLASED JA venelased tapsid KAUKASIAS ASERI.....


sina ei ole eestlane,SINUL ON VERD venelastelt või armeenlastelt, Härra EESTI PEAMINISTER KA OLI TÜRGIS, VAATA

Pilt
Pilt
Pilt
Pilt
Pilt
Pilt
Pilt
Pilt
Pilt
Pilt
Pilt
Pilt
Pilt
Pilt
Pilt

Eesti peaminister ANDRUS Andsip 24 veebruaril 2008 oli Türgis et tähistada oma Eesti vabariik sünnipäeva
Andrus ANDSIP ütles nii: Türgi alati hoiasid EESTIMAA vaba eest, mitte kunagi ei saanud venemaa okkupatsioni, ma täname teid,

tema ütles 1930.aastat EESTI vabariik oli maailmas 9 suursatkonda, üks suursatkond oli Türgis..

Eesti Vabariik Peaminister Andrus Andsip oli Bolu linna et teha Laskuda mäest alla

ANDRUS ANDSIP räägib Türgi peaministeriga
VIDEO Vaatate>
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 8368615667
Viimati muutis turk, 09 Juul, 2008 19:16, muudetud 2 korda kokku.
UURALI-ALTAI Rahvast-Turanian People(Estonia,Turkey,Finlandia,Karelian,Hungarian,Tatarstan,Komi,Mariel,Udmurt,
Turkmenistan,uigur,Mongolia,Kirgis,Kazakstan,Ösbek,Gagausia,Aseri,Kumik,Kipchak,Mansi,Nenets,Sami)Uralic-Altay people
Charlemagne
Liige
Postitusi: 1483
Liitunud: 12 Juun, 2005 18:33
Kontakt:

Postitus Postitas Charlemagne »

Siinsamas kõrval on teema: Armeenia armee, konfliktid,genotsiid. Seal käib päris huvitav arutelu. Lugege Corvuse postitusi ja uskuge,et EI OLE Türgi süüdi ka kõiges, milles teda süüdistatakse. Türgi ümber käis XIX sajandil ja XX sajandi esimesel veerandil väga inetu poliitiline mäng eurooplaste poolt, kus Türgi vähemusrahvaid kasutati lihtsalt ära. Türkidel endil olid tihti ainult halvad ja väga halvad valikud. Kas saab neid süüdistada selles, et nad oma riiki alles hoida tahtsid? Ja eurooplaste intriigidele vastasid nii, nagu see tol ajal võimalik oli. Külma sõja ajal oli Türgi üks tublimatest NATO liikmetest. Siiamaani sunnib arvukas ja hästi varustatud Türgi armee endaga arvestama ka meie põlisvaenlast. Aasia-Euroopa piiril ei ole Eestil paremat liitlast ega sõpra leida Venemaa vaoshoidmiseks. Ja meie oma otsustada on - kas võtta Türgi vastu EU-sse ja aidata areneda ilmalik-demokraatlikul Türgi riigil või põlata Türgit ja lükata niiviisi teda fundamentaalse islami poole. See oleks ühe XX sajandi suurima riigimehe Kemal Atatürki elutöö peale sülitamine kõigepealt ja oma hea NATO liitlase eemaletõukamine. See ei ole hea.
Et notre Parole s'appelle Fidélité !
Lemet
Liige
Postitusi: 19939
Liitunud: 12 Apr, 2006 15:49
Kontakt:

Postitus Postitas Lemet »

Lugupeetav kaasfoorumlane turk

Eelpool toodu on ikka nii jabur ja vaimuvaene, et tuleb ilmselt samal tasemel ka vastata. võtaks siis osakaupa:
turk kirjutas:
mmmmm sina olid armeenis tõttu sulle meeldis kõik armeenlased ja sina ütled ERITI TÜRKLASED MUSLIM tapsid kõik armeenlased,mmmmmmmm
kas sina nägid? kui kas sina oled inimene vaata üle video ma kirjutasin üleval palju video,kes tapsid keegi ,,,,SINU LEMMIK ARMEENLASED JA venelased tapsid KAUKASIAS ASERI.....
Kole lugu küll, ma nimelt olin Aserbaidžaanis ka, ja mulle meeldis nende juures ka. Millegipärast ainult aserid ei olnud eriti altid teemat arendama, leidsid, et vanad asjad, mis neist ikka lahata. Seepärast ma sinu vaatenurga vastu huvi tundsingi. Nüüd kenasti selge, et mingit armeenlaste tapmist pole kunagi olnud, ja eelmainitud härrased on jubedad valevorstid. Kas ma sain õieti aru? Muideks, see väide, et "kas sina nägid"-kas sina oled Tunguusi meteoriiti näinud? Aga usud ...

sina ei ole eestlane,SINUL ON VERD venelastelt või armeenlastelt
Et siis kõik, kes sinuga ühtemoodi ei mõtle, on kas armeenlased või venelased? Paraku pean lugupeetavat kurvastama, ei tea ühegi mainitet rahva esindajat oma suguvõsas olevat. Ja leian, et selline lahterdamine toob mulle meelde väljendid hoopis teisest ajast ja kultuuriruumist, nii kolmveerand sajandit tagasi
Härra EESTI PEAMINISTER KA OLI TÜRGIS, VAATA
??????
Mis see siia puutub? Mina olen samuti Türgis käinud. Muudab see Türgi ja türklased automaatselt väljaspool igatsugu kriitikat seisvaks või mis?

Ja veel nägemisest-fotoobjektiiv on üht-teist jäädvustanud. Krt küll, hakka või kuramuse valevorste uskuma...

http://www.hot.ee/armeenia/genocide.htm




i
Errare humanum est-aga veel inimlikum on selle teise kraesse väänamine...
Kasutaja avatar
turk
Liige
Postitusi: 137
Liitunud: 06 Juul, 2008 12:49
Kontakt:

Postitus Postitas turk »

sina oled armeenlane, lähme kohtume sinuga, läheme armeenlased poole, mida nad arvavad venelasest? ma saan rääkida vastu venemaa, armeenlased mitte kunagi ei saa rääkida vastu venemaa sest venemaa armee asub armenis, 1915. AASTAT TSAAREE venemaa armee tahaksid võtta Türgimaa armeenlasega, Türklased ajasid neid Türgist, SINA OLED KLOUN, mida sina arvad STALIN tegi migratsioni pooleli eestlased siberis? miks stalin ei puutunud armeenlasele? vist sulle ei meeldi ANDRUS ANDSIP, venemaa armee asub armeenis, Türklased on tugevad alatiseks me olime VABA

genocide vaata kes tegi

1915. aastat venemaa ja armeeni armee tahaksid võtta Türgimaa, aga türklased sõdurit eriti meie kangelane ATATÜRK ajasid teid Türgist,

VENEMAA VABARIIK ARMEE ASUB ARMEENIS LINNA GUMRI, sest ARMEENI klounu venemaa est KAUKASIAS,
vaadake pilti kuidas armeenlased ja venelased tapsid inimesed 1915 kuni 1918. aastani
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlAmcKfYjPE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1k_9jAx ... re=related

http://www.antoloji.com/siir/siir/siir_ ... iir=559568
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-a1c_5AP ... re=related
profr JUSTIN mcCARTY:terreur ARMénienne fauxgénocide
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruBc4UeQLYY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=re ... mrCJEELupA

The Russian arms in the Armenian army!venemaa armee ja armeeni armee koos )))) TÜRKLASED ON TUGEVAD,Türk Türk Türk edasi edasi edasi




vaadake video venemaa putin armee asub armeenis
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fq52XKZDZy4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7t92VHKg ... re=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iz63uS3W ... re=related

SINA käi armeenis või venemaal, sina ei ole eestlane,

meie vaenlased venelast ja armeeni...........

TÜRK TÜRK TÜRK


Stalin tegi migraatsioni pooleli eestlasi siberis,miks stalin ei teinud armeenlasi siberis? venemaa riietub
armeeni armee ,S300 raket venemaalt,

1915.aastat ka venemaa tahaksid teha okkupatsioni Türgimaa armeenlasega, Türklased ajasid neid
Viimati muutis turk, 10 Juul, 2008 15:33, muudetud 2 korda kokku.
UURALI-ALTAI Rahvast-Turanian People(Estonia,Turkey,Finlandia,Karelian,Hungarian,Tatarstan,Komi,Mariel,Udmurt,
Turkmenistan,uigur,Mongolia,Kirgis,Kazakstan,Ösbek,Gagausia,Aseri,Kumik,Kipchak,Mansi,Nenets,Sami)Uralic-Altay people
Kasutaja avatar
turk
Liige
Postitusi: 137
Liitunud: 06 Juul, 2008 12:49
Kontakt:

Postitus Postitas turk »

Lemet kirjutas:Lugupeetav kaasfoorumlane turk

Eelpool toodu on ikka nii jabur ja vaimuvaene, et tuleb ilmselt samal tasemel ka vastata. võtaks siis osakaupa:
turk kirjutas:
mmmmm sina olid armeenis tõttu sulle meeldis kõik armeenlased ja sina ütled ERITI TÜRKLASED MUSLIM tapsid kõik armeenlased,mmmmmmmm
kas sina nägid? kui kas sina oled inimene vaata üle video ma kirjutasin üleval palju video,kes tapsid keegi ,,,,SINU LEMMIK ARMEENLASED JA venelased tapsid KAUKASIAS ASERI.....
Kole lugu küll, ma nimelt olin Aserbaidžaanis ka, ja mulle meeldis nende juures ka. Millegipärast ainult aserid ei olnud eriti altid teemat arendama, leidsid, et vanad asjad, mis neist ikka lahata. Seepärast ma sinu vaatenurga vastu huvi tundsingi. Nüüd kenasti selge, et mingit armeenlaste tapmist pole kunagi olnud, ja eelmainitud härrased on jubedad valevorstid. Kas ma sain õieti aru? Muideks, see väide, et "kas sina nägid"-kas sina oled Tunguusi meteoriiti näinud? Aga usud ...

sina ei ole eestlane,SINUL ON VERD venelastelt või armeenlastelt
Et siis kõik, kes sinuga ühtemoodi ei mõtle, on kas armeenlased või venelased? Paraku pean lugupeetavat kurvastama, ei tea ühegi mainitet rahva esindajat oma suguvõsas olevat. Ja leian, et selline lahterdamine toob mulle meelde väljendid hoopis teisest ajast ja kultuuriruumist, nii kolmveerand sajandit tagasi
Härra EESTI PEAMINISTER KA OLI TÜRGIS, VAATA
??????
Mis see siia puutub? Mina olen samuti Türgis käinud. Muudab see Türgi ja türklased automaatselt väljaspool igatsugu kriitikat seisvaks või mis?

Ja veel nägemisest-fotoobjektiiv on üht-teist jäädvustanud. Krt küll, hakka või kuramuse valevorste uskuma...

http://www.hot.ee/armeenia/genocide.htm




i
provakator venelane või armeenlane ainult sulle aitab seda sait
http://www.armenianreality.com/
käi venemaal või armeenis ela seal

ASALA and Tashnak Terrorist Organizations
During the new phase of Armenian terrorism from 1973 to 1985, the terrorist organization most frequently mentioned was ASALA (The Armenian Secret Army for the Liberation of Armenia). No information has yet been published on its establishment, structure and activities. With regard to ASALA, various Armenian sources and publications provide information about certain individuals, and the results of terrorist activity, mostly obtained from publications issued by the organization or terrorist group.
This is information, which the terrorist group wishes to publish or does not object to having published. With regard to the founding of ASALA, some publications link it with the events in Lebanon; they take the view that it was established under the inspiration of the Palestinian Liberation Organization, within which it had been active. Others claim that it was founded by a small group of Armenians, who, within a short time, carried out the most sensational and effective acts of terrorism of the period.

All this is very far from providing a complete explanation of how ASALA was founded. Until the conditions under which ASALA first appeared as an organization are better known and the gap it filled is more satisfactorily elucidated, present doubts will continue for a long time to come.

It is generally known that the first Armenian terrorist activities of the new period were in accordance with the policies and targets of the Dashnak terrorist organization. Throughout the course of history as well as in the period under discussion, the Dashnaks were completely pro-Western. They adopted a policy of limited terrorist activity, which was directed basically against Turkish targets, and, as revealed by various sources of evidence, they obtained help and support from the Western states; in fact, they collaborated with them.

Basically, their principles and historical development did not allow them to adopt a different approach. In this situation, one sphere of activity still remained. Namely that relating to the Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc, which appealed to the younger Marxist Revolutionary generations and, particularly, to the "New Armenian Resistance Organizations", in France. In fact, this area had long since been filled by the Hunchaks. Since 1960, they, with their various points of view, had also been preparing for a new period of terror. However, the Hunchaks were not in evidence, and a terrorist organization, wishing to be regarded as completely new, appeared on the scene in the guise of ASALA.

When the factors leading to the new period of Armenian terrorism are taken into consideration and their aims and policies, especially as a Hunchak terrorist organization, are examined, the conclusion can be reached that ASALA is a terrorist offshoot of the Hunchaks. It was above all the conditions and new developments in Lebanon that lay behind the emergence of this group as a new terrorist organization, which because known for the various acts of terrorism for which it claimed responsibility. In fact, no significant change has taken place. The two Armenian terrorist organizations once again occupy the centre of the stage against the backdrop of history.

The first is more in evidence, operating through its terrorist offshoots, whilst the second operates under cover, in the guise of a terrorist group to which it has given manpower and expertise, as well as moral support. This group in turn carries out terrorist activities through subsidiary groups and teams.

1. Foundation and Organizational Structure

ASALA was founded in 1975. The leader of this terror organization is known to have been Agop Agopian, one of the two most active members of the six or seven founding members. The second was Agop Tarakdjian, who was personally involved in terrorism and other criminal activity and who ensured the continued existence of the organization in the absence of Agop Agopian. The second of these two men died in 1981, whilst the first continued as leader throughout the whole of this period, apart from the time spent under treatment for wound received. He was well known as a mucahid and a member of the Palestine Liberation Organization.

The organization was structured in accordance with the general practice of the Armenian terrorist groups. The Lebanon Central Committee was the supreme executive body. In 1980 this committee took on a very important form in the Lebanon and assumed the nature of a "bureau". Subordinate to the Central Committee were bodies such as the Political Committee, the Finance Committee, the Propaganda and Information Committee, the Intelligence Committee and the Military Committee. Subordinate to the Military Committee were a number of operational teams.

2. Aims and Objectives

ASALA revealed to the world its aims and objectives in a "political programme" published in the end of 1981. According to this, the aim of ASALA was "the foundation of a united Armenia under the leadership of a democratic, socialist, revolutionary government". The identity of the government in question is quite clear from the definition. All aid was welcome from the USSR and other socialist countries, while at the same time Soviet Armenia was accepted as a base in "the long struggle of the Armenian people".

In this political programme their enemies were divided into two groups. The first of these was the Dashnak Armenian terrorist group, and all the "regional reactionaries" who opposed, or at least failed to support ASALA. The second was "Turkish imperialism, aided and abetted by international imperialism".

ASALA believed that "the only way of liberating Armenian territory was through the use of violence", and issued public announcements to this effect. According to their programme, ASALA was to support all those who rejected the domination of the ruling classes and who were willing to work towards the foundation and strengthening of coalitions within the international revolutionary movement. Violence and terror formed an essential element in this programme.

In order to realise ASALA's aims and objectives it was not essential that terrorist activities should be directed solely against Turks and the friends of Turkey, or against people in positions of power or authority.

"Terror is a phenomenon" and the important point is its scope and dimension. The actual targets may be of secondary importance. Greatest stress it to be laid on murders and massacres that will arouse violent public reaction. Whether the targets are men, women or children, Turks or non-Turks, is of little significance. Nevertheless, first importance was to be given to attacks on Turkey and the Turks. The importance of the attacks and massacres carried out in the airports of Paris and Istanbul, in the Istanbul Covered Market and the airport of Orly, lay entirely in the nature and violence of the reaction these were aimed at arousing.

3. Strategy, Attitudes and Behaviour

The essential aim of ASALA was to make the Lebanon the centre for all progressive Armenian movements throughout the world and the point from which all operations would be directed. In short, all progressive Armenian groups were to unite in the Lebanon and for the basis for an "ASALA Popular Movement". In this way, all progressive Armenians could enter into an official organization in which their individual strengths could be united.

An attempt was made in the summer of 1981 to put this section of ASALA strategy into effect by calling all progressive Armenians to a meeting in the Lebanon. By "progressive" was meant "Marxist-Leninist".

The second stage of this strategy began with the terrorist activities and open war undertaken by the organization thus founded with the help of certain socialist states. Armenian terror formed an integral part of the struggle for independence in the Middle East, uniting with other movements directed against the integrity of Turkish territory. This led inevitably to the union of ASALA and PKK.

ASALA was clearly a terrorist organization in attitude and behaviour. In all ranks of the administration terror and the implementation of terror was regarded as an essential feature of the organization. The leaders murdered one another, liquidated those of whom they disapproved or had them done away with. Apart from this, each terrorist team was presented to world opinion as if it were a separate Armenian organization and all types of propaganda were carried on by this means. Responsibility for the crimes committed were assumed by various organizations whose names had never before been heard of.

A list is to be found in an appendix at the end of this Introduction showing how in 1981 and 1982 the murders, crimes, bombings and raids were carried out by a single organization but attributed to groups with a variety of different names. By examining this list the reader will find a number of operations claimed to have been carried out by a great many different Armenian groups but which actually all bear the mark of a single team and a single organization. All these so-called independent groups remained subordinate to and directed by ASALA itself.

4. Political developments

The first stage in the political development of ASALA, which is generally agreed to have been founded in 1975, was highly effective, and the organization was strengthened by new forces recruited during the Armenian Congress in Paris in 1979. It gained further strength in 1981. In 1983 it split into two factions.

The first operation carried out by ASALA was the assassination by Agop Tarakdjian, one of the founders of the organization, of Oktay Cerit, First Secretary in the Turkish Embassy in Beirut, on 16 February 1976. The period up to 1979 was marked by ASALA's involvement in the conflicts between the various Palestinian groups, in the course of which Agopian, one of the leaders, was wounded.

Links with the Armenian terrorists in France were established during the Armenian Congress meeting in Paris in 1979, which saw the organization strengthened by the addition of new elements and fresh blood. The most famous of the new members were Alex Yenikomshian and Monte Melkian. In 1981 a number of terrorist attacks carried out by ASALA on innocent groups or individuals having severely shaken its standing in world public opinion. Following the Israeli occupation of the Lebanon the ASALA leaders were forced to leave the Lebanon along with the Palestinians. A split in the organization took place in 1983.

The Agop Agopian Group - This was centred in Greece and the Middle East. Its terror was directed indiscriminately against Turks and non-Turks, as well as against innocent women and children. It was this group that was responsible for the attack at Orly.

In Western Europe the movement operated under the name of the "Asala Revolutionary Movement". This followed a more moderate course of action and directed its terror solely against Turks. The leaders of this group were Monte Melkonian and Ara Toranian. Toranian was the leader of a group centred in Paris known as the "Armenian National Movement" which described the Orly attack as a purely Fascist operation.

Melkonian, who had been born in Iran, declared his intention of setting the Armenian struggle on a sound political footing. According to this the movement had two aims; to rouse the Armenians to action, and to make common cause with other groups in their struggle against Turkey. In this second stage, Melkonian was involved in establishing alliances with other groups while Agopian continued with his own type of activity.

5. Support and Alliances

ASALA received support from three main sources:

1.The Soviet Union, the Eastern block and other socialist countries.

2.Countries such as Greece and Syria whose geopolitical expectations depended on the destabilisation of Turkey from within and without.

3.Various communist parties, indirectly from the Hunchak Armenian terrorist organization and its sympathisers, and also from the Armenian church, in spite of its difference in outlook.

In ASALA's links with other groups first priority was given to relations with non-Armenian terror groups which threatened Turkey directly or indirectly, and whose activities ran parallel to the strategy implemented by ASALA itself. In the period between 1976 and 1980 these consisted of groups such as the Palestine Liberation Organization, activist members of the various communist parties and the secret services belonging to certain states.

In 1980 ASALA widened the scope of its activities following the agreement reached with PICK at a meeting in Sidon in the Lebanon, thus establishing unity of outlook and action between ASALA and PKK. As a matter of fact, these two organizations had already displayed a marked affinity in aims, structure and beliefs. From 1983 onwards ASALA relations began to develop along the lines of the strategy laid down by Monte Melkonian.

First priority was given to terrorist activity within Turkey, and links were established with any group capable of furthering this strategy by either direct or indirect means. These groups were headed by PKK, the Turkish CommunistParty and other communist organizations.

6. Publications and information media

ASALA's most important, official organ is Haiastan. Other important publications include the periodicals Hai-Baikar, Armenia and Kaytzer, published in London.

ASALA's first radio broadcasts began in 1981 in Beyrut with a daily one-hour programme "The Voice of the Armenians in the Lebanon". Apart from these, facilities are provided by the public radio corporations and mass communication media belonging to countries with which it has established contacts.

ASALA - MR

Monta Melkonian (Meykonyan) who left ASALA and passed to France in September 1983 has disclosed that he has founded the ASALA - The Military Apparatus Of People' s Movement, ASALA - Revolutionary Movement (ASALA - MR). The recovering of the relations with the French Government, which deteriorated has been their most important goal.

While it was being thought that these would do their actions in Turkey, they have taken the North American and Western European wings totally under their own control and attracted the militants in these regions to their line. Melkonian, was killed in 1993 in Nagorno Karabakh while he was fighting against Azerbaijanis.


The Tashnak Terrorist Organization

The "Armenian Revolutionary Federation" or "Tashnak Organization" is also known as the "TashnakParty." In fact, after the communist took over of the Armenian Republic, the Tashnak organization continued its existence as a party in exile, mainly in Lebanon, Iran, France, Greece and the United States. This organization has remained active up to the present day and has performed a significant role in planning and promoting the new era of Armenian terrorism, as well as forming teams and groups for carrying out terrorist operations.

A move was made, later in its career, to have its name changed from the Armenian Revolutionary Federation to the Armenian National Committee. The intention behind this was to achieve greater effectiveness in its propagandist activities by the removal of a name that could offend Western sensibility.

1. The Structure of the Organization

a. "Bureau": This is the most important organ of the organization and takes the decisions that determine its administrative policies. In appearance the bureau represents collective leadership. It consists of eight members, one each from California, France and Iran and five from Lebanon. The members elect a chairman. The bureau, which was based in Lebanon until the outbreak of the Civil War, was moved from there to the United States and then to Greece and France. The regulations of the bureau and its decisions are kept secret. It is known that a person named Hrair Marukian, Persian by birth and domiciled in France, was its chairman until 1985.

b. "The Central Committee": It is the highest-level executive organ. It establishes the link between the bureau and the local groups and organizations. It is instituted in places where there is a sizeable Armenian population. Lebanon and France have one central committee each, whilst the United States has two, one on the eastern and' the other one on western coasts. Under the pyramid shaped structure the local organizations and their organs take place. These are known by the names of a variety of Armenian associations and clubs, such as the Federation of Armenian Youth, the Youth Organization, the Armenian Boy and Girl Scouts Club, organizations for sport and cultural activities.

c. There are also various offices operating under the central committees, such as those in charge of propagandist activities and publicity, as well as legal, financial, military and educational matters. These offices offer purely technical service or advice. As an example of an office rendering a specific service, we can mention the Committee for Supervising Armenian Immigration.

2. Aims

The Tashnak terrorist organization defines the meaning of the Armenian cause or "the Hay Taht" as the establishment of an independent and non-communist Armenia within the boundaries designated by the abrogated Sévres Treaty and the enforcement of the payment of compensation by Turkey in return for the crimes said to have been committed against the Armenians. Tashnak publications give expression to this objective in the words, "We will continue to insist on the implementation of the Sévres Treaty, as being one of the milestones in the pursuit of our cause."

In another publication, the aims of the Tashnaks are summarised as the recognition of the right of the Armenians to live in their own lands and to govern themselves. More commonly, the aims of the Tashnaks are presented as centring around three specific demands: a) the recognition of the Armenian claim that genocide was committed, b) the payment of a compensation by Turkey, c) resettlement in the Armenian homelands.

3. Strategies and Policies

Although the Tashnaks have publicly declared that their strategies are directed towards the realization of their aims through "peaceful means", neither the events of the past nor their activities in the new era of Armenian terrorism have proved this to be true. This 'party' which has all the characteristics of a terrorist organization, can assume, when needed, a peaceful guise and mislead the public by using propagandist tactics perfected through long years of experience. In fact, as has been said above, it was the Tashnaks who were responsible for the establishment of the Justice Commandos for Armenian Genocide whose name was later changed to the Armenian Revolutionary Army.

It is, indeed, the Tashnaks who decided upon and planned the assassinations and bomb assaults carried out by this group. These activities suffice to show that the Tashnak organization never abandoned the terroristic tendencies it possessed at its inception. Nonetheless, there is a significant difference between the strategies employed by the Tashnaks and those by ASALA. ASALA makes no distinction between the Turks and other nationalities, all of who can figure indiscriminately as their targets, whereas the Tashnak organization and its affiliates take Turkish citizens or official representatives of Turkey as the sole targets of their deadly operations.

After the killing of the Turkish Consul General in Los Angeles in 1972, the Justice Commandos announced that their targets were "only Turkish diplomats and Turkish institutions." The same declaration of intention was made in connection with the assault carried out by the Armenian Revolutionary Army against the Turkish Embassy in Lisbon in 1983.

The difference that exists between the strategies of the Tashnaks and ASALA may be explained by observing the historical development of the two organizations. As we have seen, the Tashnaks took a pro-Western stance in the nineteenth and the first two decades of the twentieth century and aimed at influencing public opinion in the West, whereas the Hunchaks turned towards Russia for protection and support. It is significant that, during the years 1973-1985, terrorism made use of both camps.

The strategy adopted by the Tashnaks finds its clearest expression in the announcement made in the wake of the Lisbon attack. According to this, "a national liberation movement has to go through two phases in order to attain its end: firstly, the phase of internal propaganda, when bases of support are secured; secondly, the phase of external publicity directed towards gaining the sympathy of the world and attracting attention for the cause: hence the necessity for organizing activities that serve as demonstrations..."

For the Tashnaks, Armenian terrorism was but a form of demonstration conducted as part of their strategy. In other words, the assaults, bombings and raids that were carried out and the people who were injured, killed or trampled to death in the course of these incidents, were all considered to be the necessary elements of a scenario that made up the 'demonstration'.

The Tashnak historian Varandjian described the characteristics of the Tashnak terrorist organization in the words: "Perhaps no other revolutionary party, not even the Russian Narodovoletz (Narodnaya Volya) or the Charbonari of the Italians, adepts though they were at terrorism and undaunted by anything that came in their way, could breed terrorists as reckless and impassioned as the Tashnaks. Hundreds of men carrying guns, daggers and bombs are up in arms." It is sobering to reflect that during the period we have studied the mission of these "reckless and impassioned" terrorists was to attack Turkish institutions and the Turks.

4. The Congresses of Vienna and Munich

On December 27, 1981 the following resolutions were taken in the twenty-second Tashnak Congress held in Vienna:

a) The Party's goal is to secure the establishment of a united and independent Armenia.

b) Pressure should be exerted on other Armenian organizations by the political committees to induce them to join the ranks of the Tashnaks.

c) Complete agreement with the West must be secured.

d) Close relations have to be established with the Soviet Union, and Armenian immigration must be stopped.

In the Munich Congress held at the end of 1984 with the participation of representatives for fifteen countries, the following resolutions were passed:

a) New campaigns must be launched to publicise the Armenian cause.

b) An attempt must be made to resolve the 'Armenian question' through legal and other peaceful measures, for example, a campaign must be conducted to bring the issue of genocide before the United States Congress and the United Nations Committee for Human Rights so as to secure its recognition.

In the declaration made at the end of the Congress, the delegates made the following announcement: "We are to continue our struggle for the recognition of the legal rights of the Armenian people and of the genocide committed by the Turks; as well as the payment of a compensation for the human, cultural and economic losses endured by our nation and the restitution of the Armenian national home which has belonged to us for thousands of years."

The resolutions taken at both the Congresses are of interest in facilitating the identification of the themes that were to be used as means of, propaganda by the Tashnak terrorist organization.

5. Support and Connections

The Tashnak terrorist organization derived its support largely from the United States and Europe. It operated on the basic principle of avoiding, as far as possible, contact with the other terrorist organizations.
Instead it had links with various organizations in the states mentioned, its primary source of support being the Church and the Union of Churches, as well as the Armenian lobbies and research centres.

6. Political Developments

Up to the 1970's the "liberation and independence of Soviet Armenia" formed the basis of the policies determined and implemented by the Tashnak terrorist organization. For this reason, the Tashnaks gave priority to hostilities against the U.S.S.R. and engaged in a merciless struggle against those who supported and controlled Soviet Armenia. During Christmas worship, the Archbishop of the Holy Cross Armenian Church in New York was assassinated by a Tashnak suicide-killer. The reason given was the Archbishop's approval of the situation in Soviet Armenia.

After the 1970's, the break-up, due to death and other factors, of the ruling party in the Armenian Republic and the comparisons being drawn between the Third World liberation movements and the Tashnak terrorist movements led to significant changes in the Tashnak policies. Their hostility was now directed against Turkey and the Turks. "Fascist Turkey" had become the real enemy; Turkey's ally, the United States, was also counted among their enemies.

The "Justice Commandos for Armenian Genocide" (JCAG), a terrorist group established in 1972 and organized by the Tashnaks, were put into action as a result of the policy changes mentioned above. The Aztag Shapatoriag, the propaganda organ of the Tashnaks and especially of the JCAG, issued a warning of 'terror' when they announced that "terrorism is the last hope and the only path to follow in the liberation struggles of today."

Despite all the propaganda efforts by the Tashnak terrorist organization, the Lisbon operation was seen as a complete failure. The attempts to represent the attack on the Turkish Embassy in Lisbon, as a turning point in terror did not win general acceptance. Following this, they were obliged to change the name of the JCAG to "Armenian Revolutionary Army"; even so, this did not produce the desired results. In particular, the arrest and conviction in 1984 of Sasunian, one of the Tashnak murderers, proved a great setback to Tashnak policies. The Tashnaks lost the support of American-born Armenians.

According to the Armenian Reporter, the Tashnak Party had been taken over by Lebanese Armenians from abroad, and was powerless in the face of a large majority who did not support terrorism. The weakening of the- terrorist wing of the party led to increasing clashes of opinion at the highest level of the Executive Council and Central Committees.

The highest officials in the party were split into two groups. Powerful members of the Executive Council, representatives of the Lebanese Central Committee and leading members of the party administration, were murdered in Beirut or disappeared without trace. By the end of 1985, it was impossible to speak of a united Tashnak Party.

Two important external factors helped to create this situation within the Tashnak terrorist organization. The first was the revelation that the Tashnak leaders had had connections with secret service organizations in certain countries and that these were trying to establish control over the Armenian churches.

The second was the struggle between ASALA and the Tashnaks. ASALA described the Tashnak leaders ad "parasites who were sucking the blood of Armenians dry." As a matter of fact, these developments within the Tashnak terrorist organization were not new. Whenever such conflicts and divisions arose in the past, the Tashnaka always re-emerged sometime later. In the World Armenian Congresses, the Tashnaks have always been, and will continue to be, a force to reckon with. As for the policy cahnges, they may be construed as being to temporary conflicts in leaderships.

7. The Media

Within the Armenian terrorist organizations, the Tashnak terrorist organization was experimenting in the field of propaganda and was giving support to that extent. They had acquired the means of constantly informing world opinion of their goals, their activities and their policy through the press and broadcasting media; for example, through various serials and feature films, through radio programmes, which they had purchased, thorough private radios, television and video films.

Quite a few countries showed interest and provided the Tashnaks with special support in this area. Among the most important Tashnak publications were Hairenik and Asbarez, both published in Armenian in the United States, together with the Armenian Weekly, which was published in English.

The Tashnaks also organized twenty-two world conferences in places such as Paris, Bucharest, Erevan and Munich, although the number of participants was limited. This was a tremendous propaganda and publicity effort on their part.
UURALI-ALTAI Rahvast-Turanian People(Estonia,Turkey,Finlandia,Karelian,Hungarian,Tatarstan,Komi,Mariel,Udmurt,
Turkmenistan,uigur,Mongolia,Kirgis,Kazakstan,Ösbek,Gagausia,Aseri,Kumik,Kipchak,Mansi,Nenets,Sami)Uralic-Altay people
Kasutaja avatar
turk
Liige
Postitusi: 137
Liitunud: 06 Juul, 2008 12:49
Kontakt:

Postitus Postitas turk »

Armenian Hacks and Propagandists
By Michael van der Galien

Some Armenian propagandists and their Western puppets thought they could discredit scholar Michael Gunter who reviewed a work of Guenter Lewy. Both are enemies of Armenians because they believe that what happened to the Armenians was not genocide and that the Armenians themselves were guilty of horrible crimes for which they still have to take responsibility. The reaction to those horrible views? Try to smear the scholars involved! You can read the attempts here . Sadly for the Armenian nationalists and their puppets Michael Gunter is not someone who shuts up when faced with criticism. Instead he fights back. You can read his reply to the smears of Keith David Watenpaugh (Western puppet) and Joseph A. Kechichian (just look at the name) at the same link.

Excerpts:

neither Guenter Lewy nor I deny the terrible suffering imposed upon the Armenians. Any objective reading of Lewy’s book and my review will make this obvious. What we do not agree with is the interpretation many Armenians and others make that what befell Armenians constituted premeditated genocide as defined by Armenians and their many supporters. My two critics notwithstanding, Lewy and I are not alone in this contention. Indeed, Edward J. Erickson’s review of Lewy’s book in the Middle East Journal 60 (Spring 2006) finds much to praise about it and concludes, “I highly recommend this book to anyone who is interested in the question of what really happened to the Ottoman Armenians in 1915″ (p. 379). Writing in the prestigious Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung on 23 March 2006, the distinguished German scholar of comparative genocide, Eberhard Jackel, also praised Lewy’s book. A number of years ago IJMES also published a heated exchange between Richard G. Hovannisian and the late Stanford J. Shaw, “Forum: The Armenian Question” (IJMES 9 [1978], 379–400). Such distinguished scholars of Ottoman history as Bernard Lewis, Roderic Davison, J. C. Hurewitz, and Andrew Mango, among others, have all rejected the appropriateness of the genocide label for what occurred. I guess this makes these other major scholars and publications also guilty of “fraud” and other related sins by daring to publish such thoughts!

Joseph Kéchichian furthermore incorrectly opines that “Gunter, the reviewer, occupies a central place in the massive campaign—ardently promoted by successive Turkish governments—to deny the Armenian genocide … even though he has not produced a single work with a focus on this subject.” As anyone who knows my work on the Kurdish and Armenian questions realizes, I often have taken critical stands against the Turkish government. (Maybe the Turkish government has hired me to throw its critics off the scent!) In contrast, Joseph Kéchichian and Keith Watenpaugh clearly are spokespersons for the longtime, massive Armenian campaign to trash any scholars who dare to disagree with their own particular version of history. Indeed, in France, Armenians have even succeeded in making it a crime to criticize them. In 1995 the highly respected scholar of Turkish studies Bernard Lewis was actually fined for questioning the Armenian version of history. Despite their pious denials, it is clear that my two critics would like to extend the French system to the United States.

As for Kéchichian’s erroneous assertion that I never “produced a single work with a focus on this subject,” I would like to call to his attention a lengthy article I wrote (in an Armenian journal no less) on “The Historical Origins of the Armenian–Turkish Enmity” in a special issue on “Genocide and Human Rights” (Journal of Armenian Studies IV, nos. 1–2 [1992], 257–88). A shorter, slightly different version appeared as “The Historical Origins of Contemporary Armenian Terrorism” (Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies 9 [Fall 1985], 77–96). He might also note my short piece, “Why Do the Turks Deny They Committed Genocide against the Armenians?” published in the leading German journal on Middle East politics and economics (Orient 30 [September 1989], 490–93).

Moreover, my being asked over the years to write five separate reviews in the two leading journals on Middle Eastern studies in the United States has further recognized my objectivity on this subject. In IJMES I reviewed (1) Merill D. Peterson, “Starving Armenians”: America and the Armenian Genocide, 1915–1930 and After (May 2005) and (2) Richard Hovannisian, ed., The Armenian Genocide in Perspective and Akaby Nassibian, Britain and the Armenian Question 1915–1923 (August 1989). In the Middle East Journal I reviewed (3) Vahakn N. Dadrian, German Responsibility in the Armenian Genocide (Autumn 1998), (4) Jacques Derogy, Resistance and Revenge: The Armenian Assassination of the Turkish Leaders Responsible for the 1915 Massacres and Deportations and Ephraim K. Jernazian, Judgment unto Truth: Witnessing the Armenian Genocide (Spring 1991), and (5) Kamuran Gurun, The Armenian File: The Myth of Innocence Exposed (Winter 1987).

Furthermore, my book “Pursuing the Just Cause of Their People”: A Study of Contemporary Armenian Terrorism (1986) opened with an entire chapter comparing differing Armenian and Turkish positions on what happened in 1915. It received some of the following positive reviews. “This is in every respect a splendid book, which every university library and individual interested in the contemporary Middle East ought to purchase” (Middle East Studies Bulletin 21 [December 1987]). “Professor Michael Gunter’s study of contemporary Armenian terrorism is … carefully chronicled, and there is much material which helps to explain subsequent developments. … Well documented. … Gunter has made a notable contribution” (Middle Eastern Studies 25 [October 1989]). “The book is an important one for anyone requiring a systematic account of a terrorist movement that began attacking Turkish officials and offices” (Christian Science Monitor, 10 March 1987). Illustrating the egregiously shocking way he interprets facts, however, Joseph Kéchichian pontificates that my book deals with “alleged Armenian ‘terrorism.’” Alleged? If this is how Kéchichian views recent Armenian terrorism, how can one trust his version of earlier events?

Finally surfeiting themselves with their badly conceived ad hominem attacks on my academic ethics and qualifications, these two Armenian gentlemen next turn their self-righteous diatribes against the accuracy of Lewy’s book. Although they make some valid points regarding the Armenian massacres that neither Lewy nor I deny, the two also commit several blunders and possibly outright falsifications in their haste to preach to the choir. For example, they maintain “that a host of Turkish historians” are now agreeing with the Armenian version of history. Kéchichian manages, however, to name only five. Although their position provides food for thought, it hardly amounts to a mass conversion of Turkish scholars to the Armenian line. Indeed, the claim by one of the five (Taner Akçam) that Kemal Ataturk accepted the Armenian version of history is simply not true. Rather, Ataturk criticized the incompetence of the Ottoman government for not alleviating the sufferings of both Armenians and ethnic Turks

As is usual with the Armenian puppets and propagandists they also argue that some scholars cannot be taken seriously because they have to hire translators (some cannot read Ottoman themselves). Strangely however, that does not seem to be a problem when the scholars agree with their version of history.
UURALI-ALTAI Rahvast-Turanian People(Estonia,Turkey,Finlandia,Karelian,Hungarian,Tatarstan,Komi,Mariel,Udmurt,
Turkmenistan,uigur,Mongolia,Kirgis,Kazakstan,Ösbek,Gagausia,Aseri,Kumik,Kipchak,Mansi,Nenets,Sami)Uralic-Altay people
Kasutaja avatar
turk
Liige
Postitusi: 137
Liitunud: 06 Juul, 2008 12:49
Kontakt:

Denmark's Genocide Lesson

Postitus Postitas turk »

Per Stig Moeller, Denmark's Foreign Affairs Minister, declared that Denmark does not recognize the allegations that in 1915 Ottomans committed 1genocide" to Armenians. Responding a question by Morten Messerschmidt, a member of the Foreign Relations Committee of the Danish Parliament and of the nationalist People's Party of Denmark, a coalition partner of the government, whether Denmark officially recognizes the Armenian "genocide" claims, Moeller said that "according to the Danish government, it is an issue that should be left to historians."
UURALI-ALTAI Rahvast-Turanian People(Estonia,Turkey,Finlandia,Karelian,Hungarian,Tatarstan,Komi,Mariel,Udmurt,
Turkmenistan,uigur,Mongolia,Kirgis,Kazakstan,Ösbek,Gagausia,Aseri,Kumik,Kipchak,Mansi,Nenets,Sami)Uralic-Altay people
Kasutaja avatar
turk
Liige
Postitusi: 137
Liitunud: 06 Juul, 2008 12:49
Kontakt:

Turkish Prime Ministers Speech On Reputed Armenian Genocide

Postitus Postitas turk »

Türgi peaminister vastab kõigile kes tahab kuulata

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBGKDmET ... re=related

:wink:
UURALI-ALTAI Rahvast-Turanian People(Estonia,Turkey,Finlandia,Karelian,Hungarian,Tatarstan,Komi,Mariel,Udmurt,
Turkmenistan,uigur,Mongolia,Kirgis,Kazakstan,Ösbek,Gagausia,Aseri,Kumik,Kipchak,Mansi,Nenets,Sami)Uralic-Altay people
Suletud

Kes on foorumil

Kasutajad foorumit lugemas: Registreeritud kasutajaid pole ja 7 külalist