Antud graafikud olid konkreetselt lähivõitluse peatükist (Within Visual Range), mitte õhk-õhk võimekus tervikuna. Oleksin ilmselt pidanud seda täpsustama. Kui relevantne see pärislahingutes tuleb on iseasi, mõte oli rohkem juhtida tähelepanu sellele, miks F-35 praegust laias-laastus F-16e kandis olevat Turn-Rate'i loetakse piisavaks ka lähivõitluse jaoks (ning miks selles klassis nõuded üldse püstitati, mitte karmimad).erick kirjutas:Mulle tundub, et õhk-õhk lahingutes F-35 vastu võib selle turn-rate'i kui näitaja ära unustada. Kui, siis ehk nii palju on see oluline, et ehk õnnestub 80-150km kauguselt saadetud raketi eest viimasel hetkel kuidagi ära põigata. Ground support rollis ka muidugi, kuid hetkel teemaks õhk-õhk.
Võimalik, et see oleks rohkem teema, kui vastaspoolel õnnestuks luua sama heade vargsusomadustega lennuk (üsna ebatõenäoline) ja nad oleksid võimelised teineteist tuvastastama vaid väga väikestelt distantsidelt.
Ma ei väida, et neis uuringutes leitud järeldused on kindlasti õiged (puudub igasugune kvalifikatsioon selleks), kuid võib mõista küll, miks F-22 ja F-35 programmide nõuded kujunesid välja sellised nagu need tulid. Sensoritele ja Vargsusele (selles järjekorras muide) keskenduti mitte suurest usust, et lähivõitlus on surnud, vaid et see on parim potentsiaalne viis ebasümeetrilist edu saavutada. kui see ei toimi on lähivõitluses terve müriaad muid tegureid, mis on omavad lõpptulemuses kõvasti suuremat rolli kui pisike edu lennuki manööverdusvõimes. Ärgem unustage, et lähivõitluse treeningutes lastakse õppivaid F-22e piloote aegajalt alla 60ndatest pärit treeninglennukitega T-38 (mis muidugi ei takista mõnel endisel treeneril kommentaariumites vahutamast Su-35 mõõtmatust manööverdusvõime paremusest F-35 ees, mis teeb viimase lootusetult iganenuks)The biggest benefit of EFM that could be drawn from the study was that EFM pays off significantly IF the A2A fight STARTS very ‘close in’ under 1 v. 1 situations AND inside the minimum range (Rmin) of the ‘then-era’ of Short Range Missiles with limited OBC (Off-Boresight Capability up to 30°), AND IF no further aircraft enter the combat (remains a 1 vs 1 engagement).
Ja tundub, et see neil ka õnnestus - 20:1.Gideonic kirjutas:Sensoritele ja Vargsusele (selles järjekorras muide) keskenduti mitte suurest usust, et lähivõitlus on surnud, vaid et see on parim potentsiaalne viis ebasümeetrilist edu saavutada
Trummi jutuga nõus. Kahjuks ei leia ilusaid graafikuid, mis näitasid vastavaid manöövreid liugleva raketi vastu visuaalselt väga arusaadavalt. Nendega kaasneb nendega muidugi oluline kineetilise energia kadu, mis võib samamoodi saada surmavaks lahingus.Kapten Trumm kirjutas: Lennnuki poolt tehtav raketitõrjemanööver aga pole raketi üle manööverdamine (rakett on siin alati parem), vaid lennuki seadmine raketi jaoks ebasoodsale kursile, kus lennuk lipsab raketi "silma" eest läbi suurema nurkkiirusega, kui rakett jälgida jõuab.
Nõuka taktika keskmaal oli saata teele kaks raketti väikse vahega (ripple fire), seejuures võisid raketid olla eri juhtimissüsteemiga. Selle eesmärk oligi tekitada olukord, kus esimese raketi vältimiseksNendega kaasneb nendega muidugi oluline kineetilise energia kadu, mis võib samamoodi saada surmavaks lahingus.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-41590614Sensitive information about Australia's defence programmes has been stolen in an "extensive" cyber hack.
About 30GB of data was compromised in the hack on a government contractor, including details about new fighter planes and navy vessels.
The data was commercially sensitive but not classified, the government said. It did not know if a state was involved.
Australian cyber security officials dubbed the mystery hacker "Alf", after a character on TV soap Home and Away.
The breach began in July last year, but the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) was not alerted until November. The hacker's identity is not known.
"It could be one of a number of different actors," Defence Industry Minister Christopher Pyne told the Australian Broadcasting Corp on Thursday.
"It could be a state actor, [or] a non-state actor. It could be someone who was working for another company."
Mr Pyne said he had been assured the theft was not a risk to national security.
Weaknesses exploited
The hack was described as "extensive and extreme" by ASD incident response manager Mitchell Clarke.
It included information about Australia's new A$17bn (£10bn; $13bn) F-35 Joint Strike Fighter programme, C130 transport plane and P-8 Poseidon surveillance aircraft, as well as "a few" naval vessels, he said.
Mr Clarke told a Sydney security conference that the hacker had exploited a weakness in software being used by the government contractor. The software had not been updated for 12 months.
The aerospace engineering firm was also using default passwords, he said.
ASD officials began repairing the system in December.
A report by ZDNet said officials referred to the months before ASD intervention as "Alf's mystery happy fun time".
"For those visitors overseas to Australia, Alf is Alf Stewart from an horrific Australia soap opera called Home and Away. It's just a thing we do," Mr Clarke told his audience, according to BuzzFeed.
'Salutary reminder'
The government distanced itself from the Adelaide-based firm, saying it had most likely been employed by another contractor.
"I don't think you can try and sheet blame for a small enterprise having lax cyber security back to the federal government. That is a stretch," Mr Pyne said.
"Fortunately, the data that was taken was commercial data, not military data, but it is still very serious and we will get to the bottom of it."
However, he said "we don't necessarily let the public know" about the identities of hackers, because such investigations often involve confidential information.
The incident was a "salutary reminder" about cyber security, he added.
Last year, Australia announced a surge in defence spending, a move that reflects concern over military expansion in the region.
Military spending would grow by A$29.9bn over 10 years, including plans to buy 72 Joint Strike Fighters, the 2016 Defence White Paper outlined.
Ja sellise idiootsuse pärast saab vbl. kunagi keegi surma. Vangi tuleks panna sellise kuritegeliku lohakuse pärast. Mis mõttes töötab mingi defence contractor nii, et firma itsec magab aasta otsa hambad laiali?ruger kirjutas:...
Mr Clarke told a Sydney security conference that the hacker had exploited a weakness in software being used by the government contractor. The software had not been updated for 12 months.
The aerospace engineering firm was also using default passwords, he said.
Kasutajad foorumit lugemas: Registreeritud kasutajaid pole ja 14 külalist
