www.militaar.net

Kapten Trumm kirjutas:Jalgsi teeääri läbi käia ta ilmselt ei suuda.

Juhani Putkinen kirjutas:

Kapten Trumm kirjutas:Jalgsi teeääri läbi käia ta ilmselt ei suuda.

Kui mei teeme edukalt varitsusi tema kolonnide pihta, siis ta hakkab kindlasti ka kammima teeääri. Siis on vaja kasutada Claymore (Mon-50) taolisi suundkildmiine distantslõhkeseadmetega ja ka tavalisi jalaväevastaseid miine.

In the worst-case scenario, if its own hardening e orts and NATO’s umbrella prove an insu cient deterrent to Rus- sian aggression, Estonia plans to mount a resistance against Russian occupation, using civilian resistance and unconventional warfare for which they are actively training.
e Estonian national security o cial said, “We would be happy to see the Estonian-U.S. SOF partnership furthered. Anything that relates to unconventional warfare is relevant.” Estonian and U.S. SOF operated closely together in Afghanistan over the past decade, and Estonian special operations plans include a variety of support roles by U.S. SOF, scaled according to the threat level. Estonian special opera- tions o cers have described their doctrine, planning, and preparations to mount this e ort, along with the types of assistance they would most like to receive from abroad. ese include training, planning, and preparation initially, plus direct support in the event of escala- tion to armed hostilities—complete with the provision of communi- cations links, joint terminal air controllers (JTACs), intelligence, and air support (interviews with Estonian special operations o cers, June 2016).
While Estonia is preparing for a variety of scenarios, its small defense budget forces it to make some choices. Given the futility of a conventional matchup against Russia, one Estonian special opera- tions o cer said the best materiel would be man-portable air defense systems (MANPADs) and anti-tank Javelins rather than the recently purchased armored personnel carriers. MANPADS could be used to good e ect by Estonians ghting a guerrilla-style war, though risks include proliferation of weapons systems that pose a threat to civil avi- ation if they fall into the wrong hands. Estonian SOF have closely studied the irregular tactics employed in the recent decade of ght- ing elsewhere to adapt them to their own needs should they become insurgents themselves. e primary injunction is for them to become a seamless part of the whole-of-government e ort. An admonition to work harmoniously with civilian agencies and the population is posted in their headquarters: “No [direct action] monkeys in unconventional warfare,” the poster reads, with a red line drawn through a photo of a fully kitted commando.

Leo kirjutas:Kus Eestis lõhkeainet toodetakse?

Leo kirjutas:Teine küsimus, millises Eesti potitehases hakatakse vajadusel miine tootma?