Kui midagi edukaks ja samas usutavaks lugeda tahetakse siis mina paneksin selleks
Islandi. 6. aprill oli neil 1096 aktiivset juhtumit. 18. aprill 460 aktiivset juhtumit.
suletud juhtumitest 0.69% surmaga lõppenud.
Why has Iceland chosen not to implement a lockdown?
Iceland has yet to take many of the draconian measures seen across Europe and Asia of state-wide lockdowns, though the island country has banned gatherings of 20 people or more and closed secondary and tertiary schools.
Officials say more restrictive measures haven't been needed because they were better prepared and armed with data to track the virus.
"Testing and contact tracing are one of the key reasons why a lockdown has not been considered necessary up to this point,"
"There is also another reason, no less important, we have pursued a very aggressive policy of quarantine for individuals -- suspected to be at risk of having contracted the virus -- for much longer and at a higher scale than most other countries we are aware of."
Mass testimine koos vähemate piirangutega. Tegeletakse ikkagi iga juhtumi kontaktidega mitte ei löödud sellele kohe käega kui esimised siseriiklikud edasikanded toimusid.
Testimine ei ole suunatud riskirühmadele ja tulemuseks teadmine, et 50% nakatunutest ei täheldanud sümptomeid või kannatasid vaid väheste sümptomite all.
Aga positiivsed ja kontaktsed pandi karmimasse karantiini mis kestvus oli pikem kui teadaolevalt teistel riikidel.
Could they provide a roadmap for other countries?
He says Iceland could help countries develop models for the spread of the disease, or to help researchers understand community transmissions.
ja oleksid nõus mudelite valmistamises aitama ka teisi riike.
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/01/euro ... index.html
Majandus inimesed aga ei leia kindlasti seda riiki oma maailma kaardilt ülessegi. Võibolla eelmise majanduskriisi aegse käitumise tõttu.
Uudishimulik loll on ikka huvitavam olla kui ignorantne loll.