Ausalt-öeldes väike kahtluseuss on, et see mitte lukustumine päris juhus ei olnud. Vaadates mis tüüpi lennukit sihiti ei välistaks ka mingit EW tegevust.davidsoniharald kirjutas: ↑14 Sept, 2023 12:30 Vedas orkidel roppu moodi. Muidu oleks nad kõik ühe loll-ivani pärast maa sisse tambitud.
Sellest ka väga hea dokk tehtud, kahjuks tasuline (kanali muud videod ka YTs, soovitan!):Bigum would later admit he didn't notice the drift because he and his wing-man were determined to score a MiG kill.[3] Despite this, they still managed to achieve radar lock up on both as-Sammarai and Awad, and each fired a missile at them. Both missed. Bigum fired a second missile at Awad, but Awad landed his aircraft before the missile arrived. Bigum fired again at as-Sammarai as he was on his final landing approach, but Bigum lost the radar lock as as-Sammarai landed and the missile impacted the ground about 10 ft (3 m) from as-Sammarai's left wingtip. Bigum and Broome egressed the area before they could be shot down by surface-to-air missiles, which were still targeting them.[2][4]
Tundub olema jah seesama,tänud.
Paistab, et rahvusvaheline mereõigus seda tegelikult ei reguleeri. Lobarobot vastas nii:kaugeltuuriv kirjutas: ↑15 Sept, 2023 11:02 ...
Kuidas selle majandusvõõndiga on,kas ikka päris tohib teise riigi majandusvõõndis õppusi pidada.Kas oskab keegi asja seletada juriidilises võtmes?
Ühesõnaga - ei ole viisakas, aga keelatud otseslt ei ole.Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ):
Definition: The EEZ extends 200 nautical miles from a country's coastline. Within this zone, the coastal state has special rights to explore and exploit, as well as conserve and manage natural resources, both living and non-living, in the water column and on and under the seabed.
Sovereign Rights: While the coastal state has sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring, exploiting, conserving, and managing natural resources in its EEZ, it does not have full sovereignty over the area. This means that other states have certain freedoms in the EEZ, such as freedom of navigation and overflight.
Military Exercises in Another Country's EEZ:
Freedom of Navigation: UNCLOS recognizes the freedom of navigation, which means that ships of all states enjoy the right of innocent passage through territorial seas, and there is freedom of navigation beyond the territorial sea and in the EEZ. This means that military vessels of one state can navigate through the EEZ of another state.
Military Activities: The issue of conducting military exercises in another country's EEZ is a contentious one. UNCLOS does not explicitly prohibit military activities in the EEZs, but it requires states to have due regard for the rights and duties of the coastal state. Some countries interpret this to mean that military exercises or surveillance activities without the consent of the coastal state infringe upon its rights. Others argue that these are part of the freedom of navigation and are therefore permitted.
Diplomatic Tensions: Even if military exercises in another country's EEZ might be technically permissible under UNCLOS, they can lead to diplomatic tensions. The coastal state might view such exercises as a threat or an act of aggression, even if they are intended as routine or defensive in nature.
Notification and Communication: Some argue that, as a matter of courtesy and to prevent misunderstandings, states conducting military exercises in another's EEZ should notify the coastal state in advance. This is not a requirement under UNCLOS, but it can help in building trust and avoiding potential conflicts.
Disputes: If a coastal state believes its rights in its EEZ are being violated by another state's military activities, it can seek peaceful dispute resolution mechanisms provided under UNCLOS. This might include negotiation, mediation, or arbitration.
...
military exercises in other countries economic zone
https://www.digi24.ro/stiri/actualitate ... ul-2506707Rumeenia on olenevalt "ohutasemest" valmis kasutama Venemaa droonide vastu õhutõrjesüsteeme ja kasutab riigi territooriumi kaitsmiseks "kogu sõjalist jõudu", teatas kaitsestaabi ülema asetäitja kindral Gheorghiță Vlad. Samuti saatis Rumeenia armee Ukraina piirile Doonau delta piirkonda 600 sõdurit ja radarid.
„Otsustasime lähetada umbes 600 sõdurit, et tugevdada oma kaitseliini Dobrudža põhjaosas. Võtsime kasutusele mõned radarid, kaitse on aktiveeritud ja arutasime oma liitlaspartneritega (NATO), et leida lahendusi Venemaa agressioonile vastu seista," ütles kindral Vlad Rootsi telejaamale antud intervjuus. Küsimusele, kas Rumeenia kasutab oma õhutõrjesüsteeme Venemaa droonide vastu, teatas kindral: "Sõltuvalt ohu tasandist oleme valmis kasutama kogu sõjalist jõudu Rumeenia territooriumi kaitsmiseks". Kaitseministeerium otsustas neljapäeval, 14. septembril piirata lende Ukraina piiril asuvas Põhja-Dobrogea õhuruumis. Teade tuli kontekstis, kus sama ministeerium otsustas rajada kaks õhutõrjevarjendit Plauru-Ceatalchioi piirkonda, kuhu on viimastel päevadel langenud vähemalt kolm Vene armee drooni pärast intensiivseid rünnakuid Ukraina taristule Doonau sadamates.
Kasutajad foorumit lugemas: Registreeritud kasutajaid pole ja 1 külaline
