www.militaar.net

hannesK kirjutas:Väljjaspool Hiinat on väidetavalt 888 juhtu ja 3 surma see ei lähe isegi Hiina kommunistide ststistikaga kokku.

Kriku kirjutas:

hannesK kirjutas:Väljjaspool Hiinat on väidetavalt 888 juhtu ja 3 surma see ei lähe isegi Hiina kommunistide ststistikaga kokku.

Väljaspool Hiinat suudetakse vähestele haigusjuhtudele intensiivravi jms. paremini tagada?

“Many people are testing positive on the ship, but that is because we are testing everyone onboard, regardless of their medical condition,” said Shigeru Omi, the chief director of the Japan Community Health Care Organisation. “And 70% of those testing positive are not showing any symptoms at all.”

hannesK kirjutas:Väga huvitav infokild Jaapani tervishoiu direktor ( Shigeru Omi, the chief director of the Japan Community Health Care Organisation.)
Ütleb,et Diamond Princessil 70% testitutest kes osutuvad positiivseks ei ole mingeid haigus sümptomeid aga on juba haigusekandjad.
See on päris karm, Inglismaa patsient 0 nakatas 11 inimest enne kui ise haigeks jäi sellest võiks järeldada,et terve laev on haige.
1 Jaapani meditsiini töötaja kellel ei olnud reisjate ega meeskonnaga kokkupuudet aga viibis laeval on tänaseks haige. See nagu kinnitaks seda,et viirus on nakkav ja võid selle saada siis õhust ? usun,et kannavad kummikindaid etc vähemalt kõikidelt videodelt paistavad väga oma turvalisuse eest hoolitsevat

“Many people are testing positive on the ship, but that is because we are testing everyone onboard, regardless of their medical condition,” said Shigeru Omi, the chief director of the Japan Community Health Care Organisation. “And 70% of those testing positive are not showing any symptoms at all.”

hannesK kirjutas:

Kriku kirjutas:

hannesK kirjutas:Väljjaspool Hiinat on väidetavalt 888 juhtu ja 3 surma see ei lähe isegi Hiina kommunistide ststistikaga kokku.

Väljaspool Hiinat suudetakse vähestele haigusjuhtudele intensiivravi jms. paremini tagada?

vaadates kui suure surve all on Hiina meditsiini süsteem siis võib seda arvata jah, suudetakse siis kauem elus hoida, aeg näitab.

hannesK kirjutas:1 Jaapani meditsiini töötaja kellel ei olnud reisjate ega meeskonnaga kokkupuudet aga viibis laeval on tänaseks haige. See nagu kinnitaks seda,et viirus on nakkav ja võid selle saada siis õhust ?

Kriku kirjutas:

hannesK kirjutas:WHO Direktor Corona viirus levib õhukaudu !
https://twitter.com/howroute/status/122 ... 15168?s=21

Pikemalt sel teemal: https://theconversation.com/theres-no-e ... ble-131653

A recent announcement by a Chinese health official suggested the new coronavirus might spread more easily than we thought, via an “airborne route”. The virus is now known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), while the name of the disease it causes is now called COVID-19.

The Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention almost immediately corrected the announcement, noting SARS-CoV-2 was not known to be an airborne virus.

The centre confirmed the virus appears to spread via droplets, direct contact and by coming into contact with contaminated surfaces and objects. The World Health Organisation agrees.

So far no infectious virus has been recovered from captured air samples. This would need to occur to demonstrate the virus was airborne.

When we sneeze, cough or talk, we expel particles in a range of sizes.

The bigger, wet droplets larger than 5-10 millionths of a meter (µm or micrometre) fall to the ground within seconds or land on another surface.

These wet droplets are currently considered to be the highest risk routes for the SARS-CoV-2.

But smaller particles aren’t implicated in the spread of SARS-CoV-2.

Smaller particles remain suspended in the air and evaporate very quickly (at less than one-tenth of a second in dry air). They leave behind gel-like particles made of proteins, salts and other things, including viruses.

These leftovers are called “droplet nuclei” and can be inhaled. They may remain aloft for hours, riding the air currents through a hospital corridor, shopping centre or office block. This is what we mean when we talk about something being airborne.

Read more: We're in danger of drowning in a coronavirus 'infodemic'. Here's how we can cut through the noise

But there’s more to airborne spread. To infect humans, the droplet nuclei need to contain infectious virus. The virus must be able to land on our mucous membranes – the soft lining of our ears, nose, conjunctiva (eyelid), throat and digestive tract and it must be able to enter our cells and replicate.

There also needs to be enough virus to overcome our early immune responses to the invader and start an infection.

So a few stars have to align for airborne infection to result.

"This analysis provides evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct nor a purposefully manipulated virus." Before you read any speculation about SARS-CoV-2 origins, read this post by some leading researchers in pathogen evolution/genomics

China’s National Health Commission issued order to #Wuhan Institute of Virology bio weapons lab forbidding release of any info of #COVID19!

Kapten Trumm kirjutas:Eks see lääne meditsiini parem võimekus (Hiinas pidi ka gripi suremus kõrge olema) kukub kolinal kokku, kui siin hakkab massiline haigestumine pihta.

The Novel Coronavirus, 2019-nCoV, is Highly Contagious and More Infectious Than Initially Estimated #COVID19 http://j.mp/2SGXW1i Initially, the basic reproductive number, R0, was estimated to be 2.2 to 2.7.

Canada is doing the opposite.

1000's arrive daily from China and face no health check or mandatory quarantine.

Ppl are advised to self-quarantine if sick.

THAT'S what erodes public trust / confidence.

Endangering the populace.

A 24-year-old, who travelled from Wuhan to Guangzhou last month, started coughing six days after her 15-day quarantine ended and tested positive for #coronavirus yesterday - yet another case where patients developed symptoms after 14-day incubation period.

This incident from a @SCMPNews reporter is worrisome. A person passed a 15 day quarantine, but then got sick 6 days later after release. This incident raises the question if the 14 day quarantine is enough or not for #SARSCoV2.

taara kirjutas:

ruger kirjutas:Hiinas on garantiini all ca 760 miljonit inimest

760 million people are under quarantine in China

That’s 10% of the world population

https://twitter.com/All_Coronavirus/sta ... 7487303681

Mis Sa ise ka usud seda jama, mida postitad? Kes neid 760 miljonit inimest kinni hoiab ja valvab?

Nearly half of China's population — 780 million people — is living under some form of travel restrictions as authorities continue to contain the novel coronavirus outbreak.

According to analysis done by CNN, travel restrictions, of varying degrees are still being enforced in various provinces and cities across mainland China including Hubei, Liaoning, Beijing and Shanghai affecting over 780 million people. Restrictions include everything from self-quarantines to limits on who can come and go from neighborhoods.