Re: Venemaa sõjaline võimekus ja armeereform(id)
Postitatud: 24 Nov, 2016 19:23
Huvitav - teist päeva // teist korda järjest puhastan seda teemat sellesama kohani
Militaarteemad minevikust kaasaega
https://militaar.net/phpBB2/

Ei tahaks uskuda, et meil neid vaja oleks tunda. Need riistad on n.ö. "kõrgema juhatuse" reservis ja alles paar aastat tagasi asusid peamiselt Põhja-Kaukaasia piirkonnas. Kasutati ka Afghanistani ja Tšetšeenia sõdades.Lemet kirjutas:Pildiseeria õppustelt, venelaste 240 mm iseliikuvad miinipildujad Tjulpan. Et oleks äratuntavad....
Kas olen midagi eitanud? Kelle poolt on "überkriitika" antud juhul?Kapten Trumm kirjutas:Sellise "loogikaga" on võimalik eitada praktiliselt iga asja, eriti kui lisada sinna über kriteerium "ei usu", "arvan" jne.
Gruusia sõja käigus viidi mingi pataljoni jagu seltskonda 24 tunniga Pihkvast sõjapiirkonda (ja samakiiresti tehakse ka vastupidine ots kui vaja).
Küsimus on ainult selles, kas seda vastane peab vajalikuks või ei pea - toomises pole küse (masin on transpordilennukiga toodav).
Kui nt vastane takerdub linnalahingutes, siis on taoliste asjade (lisaks ka "Buratinod" ja asjad) järgi toomine igati ootuspärane samm.
Laskma mitte über- või tuumamoona, vaid tavalisi, NSVL ajal toodetud miine hoonetevaheliste märkide pihta, mida haubitsaga raske tabada on (nt piirkonnad Lasnamäe 12 kordsete "kindlusmajade" vahel, kuhu pääseb väga järsu trajektooriga.
Lemet ei väitnud, Lemeti lausungil oli taga küsimärk, mis üldiselt tähendab küsimist, mitte väitmist. Jah, küsisin, kas akf arvates on teadmised "arvatava vaenlase" tehnika kohta saatanast. Sest lause "...Ei tahaks uskuda, et meil neid vaja oleks tunda..." laseb nii arvata. Aga ilmselt sain akf lausest valesti aru.Lemet väitis, et minu arvates olevat vist teadmine saadanast..

Tänan.Kapten Trumm kirjutas:Meie suur sõber seltsimees Assad põmmutas sellistega Homsi linnakvartaleid maapealt minema:
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Security ... orld-video
Tundub ka, et see "kõrgem ülemjuhatus" pidas sündmusi Donbassis piisavalt prioriteetseks, et neid seal kasutada
https://burkonews.info/240-mm-mortars-2 ... n-donetsk/
https://informnapalm.org/2519-240-mm-my ... -donetske/
http://www.segodnya.ua/regions/donetsk/ ... 53888.html
http://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm/170456... The SMM UAVs continued observing heavy military hardware in areas that are not compliant with the respective withdrawal lines. On 4 July, five MBTs were spotted in “DPR”-controlled areas east of Shyrokyne. Also in “DPR”-controlled areas, two MBTs were observed near Michurine (55km north-east of Mariupol), a concentration of ten MBTs and eight APCs near Sontseve (61km north-east of Mariupol), four self-propelled howitzers also in the same sector and a concentration of seven MBTs, 23 APCs, two pontoon bridge layers, as well as one 240mm mortar (Tyulpan) near Komsomolske (44km south-east of Donetsk). ...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 36951.htmlRussia is reportedly preparing to upgrade its Soviet-era T-80 battle tanks in order to bring them back into service.
Up to 3,000 of the tanks, which entered service in 1976, will be updated to bring their combat power closer to the current T-90 model.
"At present, the preparative works to start the modernisation of the first T-80BV MBTs are at a final stage," a defence industry source told military magazine Jane's Defence Weekly.
The "overhaul and modernisation" of the tanks "will be launched next year" the source added. They said the number of tanks to be upgraded will be determined by the military.
Updated versions of the armoured combat vehicle will reportedly feature an upgraded fire-control system used by the T-90, an updated energy generator and advanced explosive reactive armour plates.
The modified tanks will be suitable for use in the Arctic, Far East and Siberia, the source said.
Around 550 T-80 tanks are still in service in the Russian military.
They are expected to bridge the gap until Russia completes the development of its new high-tech Armata supertank.
British military intelligence issued a warning casting doubt on the UK's ability to combat the threat of the new T-14 tanks.
The report said the tank was already lighter, faster and stealthier than any Western rival, and could be fitted with the same radar system currently used by Russian fighter jets.
The Armata’s main advantage over existing vehicles is the inclusion of an unmanned turret, which is controlled remotely from an isolated armoured capsule.
It only requires two people to operate the vehicle and it also boasts a state-of-the-art radar system that can simultaneously track up to 40 ground and 25 air targets within a 60-mile (100km) radius.
The Kremlin has previously said it plans to build 120 Armata tanks a year from 2018.
On Monday, US State Department spokesman John Kerry warned Moscow's deployment of Iskander and S-400 missiles to eastern Europe was "destabilising" and urged Moscow to "refrain from words or deeds that are inconsistent with the goal of promoting security and stability".
President Vladimir Putin's spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, told reporters that the Russian military needs to respond to what he described as Nato's aggressive moves.
"Russia is doing what is necessary to protect itself amid Nato's expansion toward its borders," Mr Peskov said.
"The alliance is a truly aggressive bloc, so Russia does what it has to do. It has every sovereign right to take necessary measures throughout the territory of the Russian Federation."
Moscow has also deployed new anti-ship missiles on Pacific islands controlled by Russia but also claimed by Japan.
Bal and Bastion missile systems have been stationed on the islands, called the southern Kurils by Russia and the Northern Territories by Japan, the Boyevaya Vakhta (Combat Duty) newspaper of Russia's Pacific Fleet reports.
vast veetakse igalepoole kus tõsisem andmine käimas ja kus vastase potensiaalne kontsentratsioon kõrge.. Groznõi pihta anti ka Tšetseenia sõja ajal Tulbist.mart2 kirjutas: ..
Siin tuleb arvestada seda, et Lennujaam oli muutunud juba sümboliks ja selle iga hinnaga võtmine auasjaks. Kui palju oli juba erinevatel andmetel merejalaväelasi ja dessantnikuid magama pandud? Mõned sajad? Kindlustused oli vaja purustada. Teadaolevalt üks relv.
Kas Eestisse sõja korral võidakse tuua? Ei tea. Kas meil on koheselt selliseid rünnatavaid objekte? Kas see teadmine nõuaks väljaõppe ja varustatuse muutmist???![]()