Militaarteemad minevikust kaasaega
https://militaar.net/phpBB2/
F-35 ei kasuta minu teada enam Link-16. Aga muidu küll jah. Gripen on Link-16 compatible, kuid Gripeni native võrk on oluliselt rohkem infot kandev ja väidetavalt ka turvalisem. Ericsson ikkagi.Kapten Trumm kirjutas:Rootslased ja soomlased pidid ise nimetama NATO Link-16 "downgrade".
Kusjuures lisaks sellele on brittidel on tõsine huvi hakkata roteerima mariinide lennukeid enda lennukikandjatele ja vastupidi. Esimesed F-35B'd mis HMS Queen Elizabeth'il tema merekatsetuste ajal lendavad, saavad olema just mariinide omad.Lemet kirjutas:Lennuüksuse arvukuselt kipub Kuznetsoviga samasse auku, ehitada plaanitakse 11 laeva. Pluss veel teised samalaadsed. Pluss veel kasutusel olevad täismõõdus CATOBAR lennukikandjad. Ja vaesed kaljapatrioodid väidavad siiani tõsimeelselt, et Kuzja on mingi tõsiseltvõetav argument vastasseisus...
Ehk ainult sisemiselt tangitud F-35A'ga suudab ta regulaarselt teha kaks (teatud tüüpi) treeninglendu (eeldatavasti jäädes vahepeal lihtsalt lennualasse tiirutama). Samas, tehes sama missiooni kahe välise kütusepaagiga varustatud F-15C'ga, sai ta alati vahepeal "bingo fuel" ning pidi käima baasis tankimas.Q: "How's the range of the aircraft from an operator perspective?"
CAP: "I think people that say it doesn't have the range are someone that probably looks at a single-engine aircraft and think so it's just an F-16. It ain't an F-16.
I fly on a regular basis two training stories worth of training that I would do in an F-15C model with two external tanks on it. So I would go up go out and do one offensive push where we do basically one offensive strike into the area and out and hey I'm bingo I've got to go home on fuel with the F-15C.
In the F-35 I'll go out and do two of those without any problem and one of the things that we found out in the exercise up in Wisconsin, was after we were done firing our weapons after we were done getting everybody into and out of the combat area, if we wanted to go on to keep fighting at that point they would ask us to stick around because of all the sensors we could provide and the data link we could provide to help the 4th gen aircraft who still had missiles on board. We still had fuel and the sensors to be able to provide that information form.
So it's got legs, it's got really long legs."
Second Line of Defense and a handful of journalists recently had the opportunity to visit with four such pilots during a “Proof of Concept” demonstration on the USS America, November 19, 2016.
The four pilots are some of the most experienced F-35B pilots in the United States Marine Corps (USMC);
- George “Sack” Rowell, Commanding Officer (CO) of VMX-1 (Marine Operational Test & Evaluation Squadron). Prior to the F-35, Rowell spent appx. 3000 hours over 18 years of flying the F/A-18 Hornet. Previously the CO of VMFA(AW)-533
- Col. Chad “Mo” Vaughn, CO of VMFA-211. Prior to the F-35, Vaughn spent a couple 1000 hrs over 13 years in the F/A-18A-D Hornet, as well as time in the F-16A-B Fighting Falcon/Viper and F/A-18 Super Hornet at NAS Fallon.
- Col. Rich “BC” Rusnok, slated to become the CO of VMFA-121 in March 2017. Prior to the F-35, Price spent appx. 7 years flying the AV-8B Harrier II with additional time in the F/A-18 Hornet.
- Col. John “Guts” Price, slated CO for VFMA-122 (2018). Prior to the F-35, Price spent appx. 1200 hrs and 10 years flying the AV-8B Harrier II, and has about 400 hrs in the F-35 over the past 3 years.
See on ammu teada fakt. Minu teada on nad isegi vene inseneridelt mingitpidi kogemusi korjanud selle koha pealt.Kapten Trumm kirjutas:Kuulsin ühes vene lennukiehitust puudutavas saates väidet, et vertikaalstardiga F-35 loomisel olevat ameeriklastele sügavat mõju avaldanud 1992 avalikkusele Prantsusmaal demotud Jak-141
Kolmest punktist keeratava mootoridüüs on nende kahe lennuki kõige sarnasem komponent. See on üsna suure tõenäosusega Jak'ilt maha viksitud(või vähemasti tugevalt inspireeritud):Cooperation with Lockheed
Following the announcement by the CIS on September 1991 that it could no longer fund development of the Yak-41M, Yakovlev entered into discussions with several foreign partners who could help fund the program. Lockheed Corporation, which was in the process of developing the X-35 for the US Joint Strike Fighter program, stepped forward, and with their assistance 48-2 was displayed at the Farnborough Airshow in September 1992. Yakovlev announced that they had reached an agreement with Lockheed for funds of $385 to $400 million for three new prototypes and an additional static test aircraft to test improvements in design and avionics. Planned modifications for the proposed Yak-41M included an increase in STOL weight to 21,500 kg (47,400 lb). One of the prototypes would have been a dual-control trainer. Though no longer flyable, both 48-2 and 48-3 were exhibited at the 1993 Moscow airshow. The partnership began in late 1991, though it was not publicly revealed by Yakovlev until 6 September 1992, and was not revealed by Lockheed until June 1994.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yakovlev_ ... h_Lockheed
Sellegipoolest, lisaks elektroonikale on veel üks väga suur erinevus, mistõttu oleks veits liig X-35't Jak-141 klooniks kutsuda. See on asii mille venelased pidevalt oma propas ära unustavad, justkui see oleks miski pisiasi. Nimelt mootori "kardaanivõlliga" otseühenduses olev tõsteventilaator (Lift-Fan), mida Lockheed Martin, Pratt & Whitney ning Rolls-Royce 10 aastat välja töötasid, ning mille osas leidus skeptikuid küll ja veel. Selle lahendus oli oli suurim X-35 eelis Boeing X-32 ees. Niipea kui seda viimaks 2000. aastal edukalt demoti, oli Boeingu lahendusega "krõshka".Kapten Trumm kirjutas:See pole mõistagi päris 1:1 ja ilmselt ameeriklastel lahendab paljusid probleeme parem elektroonika (mis venelastele lõpuks fataalseks said).
Seal on mõningaid spekulatsioone, mis on ajaga tõesteks osutunud (mis viitab et autorid teadsid rohkem kui väitsid). Näiteks mainiti seal esimesen, et F-35 on üsna ainulaadne samaegselt radari-blokkerina töötav järelpõleti mis on mootoridüüsi keskele kinnitatud, varjates täielikult mootori tagakülje. See on arvatavasti põhjus, miks iga viimanegi pilt seisva mootoriga lennukist on alati mootorikattega.Powering the Lightning II
April 2012 Chris Kjelgaard
"...Another key feature of the F135 is its augmentor, or afterburner system. While available details of the augmentor are sketchy, the F135 is known to employ multi-zone (probably three-zone) fuel injection aft of the afterburner’s pilot light. These zones inject fuel independently, so that the afterburner does not act in an all-or-nothing way but instead provides a variable range of additional, smoothly transitioning wet thrust at the pilot’s command. Also, like the F119 augmentor, the F135 augmentor is stealthy: The design of the two engines’ augmentors places multi-zone fuel injection into curved vanes which eliminate conventional spray bars and flame holders and block the line of sight to the turbine when looking into the engine from behind...."
Harrierile mõjutuste osas pole ka väga midagi imestada, sest selle F-35 LiftSystem töötas välja ju sama firma, mis Harrieri lahenduse, Rolls-Royce.Kapten Trumm kirjutas:Kusjuures Jak näib kordavat eelkäija vigu ja F-35 näib kordavat Harrieri edu.
Kui alt vaatad, siis F-35-l on olemas põikikalde (roll) korrigeerimiseks väljalaskedüüsid tiibade all (väiksed luugid teliku kõrval), Jak-il neid ei ole (ja ei olnud ka eelkäijatel).
Selline lahendus muudab masina haavatavaks nt tuulele ning mingist kalde nurgast alates muutub see juhitamatuks.
Miks Harriere vähem hunnikusse kukkus kui Jak-e, oli ju see pisike asi, et Harrieril sai lennuki kõikumisi piloot korrigeerida, Jak-il aga jäi ühel hetkel lihtsalt sangade tõmbamine (või jõudis automaatne katapulteerumine ette).
![[1]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b4/U.S._Marine_Corps_F-35_Lightning_II_aircraft_and_F-18_Hornets_assigned_to_Naval_Air_Station_Pensacola_fly_over_the_northwest_coast_of_Florida_May_15%2C_2013_130515-F-BU402-159.jpg){kind=link}
![[2]](http://lifeasahuman.com/files/2012/03/f-35c-f-18.jpg){kind=link}