Re: Süüria (kodusõda)
Postitatud: 08 Mär, 2017 14:38
SAA Eufrati ääres väljas ja ISIS ka sealtpoolt nüüd SAA kaitse all. Ma pakun, et SAA edenemishoog nüüd vaibub ja ISIS saab koondada oma ressursid kurdide ja ameeriklaste vastu.
Nagu ka Jaanuaris, leidub ka praegu küllalt neid, kes peavad seda ebatõenäoliseks.sinisinine kirjutas:Tagantjärgi leiab kinnitust kuulujutt juutide sooritatud rünnakust Hezbolale üle antud õhutõrje komplekside hävitamiseks ja ühtlasi ka S-300 lõpetas eksistentsi
Le Figaro andmetel eksisid juudid F-35 lennates Süüriasse, tulemuseks ladu Pansiridega mis olid ettenähtud Hezbolale ja ühtlasi ka S-300 õhutõrje raketisüsteemi patarei lõpetasid oleluse.
https://inforesist.org/le-figaro-izrail ... ntsiryami/
Sarnaseid raporteid on ilmunud ka varem, isegi ennem kui F-35'ed üldse kätte saadi. Ning Süüriat on nad korduvalt (ka hiljuti) edukalt pommitada saanud ka ilma F-35'eta. Eriti jabur on väide üle Assadi palee lendamisest. Kõlab sellise Vene/Araabia propaganda stiilis trollimisenaBut still, Syria does not have any S-300 batteries as the report claims—the only "triple digit" SAM systems deployed to Syria are owned and operated by Russia. In particular, these include an S-400 battery at Russia's air base south of Latakia and a S-300 battery deployed near Russia's expanded warm-water naval facility in Tartus, Syria. With this in mind, unless Israel has taken upon itself to destroy Russian SAM systems and Russia had no issue with it, this claimed attack did not happen.
As for flying over Assad's palace in some show of force, the likelihood that actually happened is slim to none. Why would Israel provoke an already very fragile situation in Syria and especially risk their most prized weapon system—including the international fallout that would go along with it—for what amounts to a hollywood-like intimidation gag? Coincidentally, I also find it funny how Israeli seems to always buzz their potential enemies' palaces in media reports. In the past, when Israel was proving its air dominance in the region, such a tactic may have been used sparingly for psychological warfare purposes, but it serves little purpose today on battlefield Syria. Sure, it sounds cool—like something ripped from an '80s action movie or bar room tale—but in reality, it only invites additional risk and the IAF has nothing to prove to their neighbors.
https://twitter.com/ItalianPolitics/sta ... 0917186561US 75th Ranger Regiment arrived in Syria. Chiefs of Staff Gerasimov, Akar and Dunford agreeing on.
https://already-happened.com/2017/03/08 ... -in-syria/Marines from an amphibious task force have left their ships in the Middle East and deployed to Syria, establishing an outpost from which they can fire artillery guns in support of the fight to take back the city of Raqqa from the Islamic State, defense officials said.
The deployment marks a new escalation in the U.S. war in Syria, and puts conventional U.S. troops in the battle. Several hundred Special Operations troops have advised local forces there for months, but the Pentagon has shied away from using conventional forces in Syria. The new mission comes as the Trump administration weighs a plan to take back Raqqa, the so-called capital of the Islamic State, that also includes more Special Operations troops and attack helicopters.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 85766.htmlRussia has been voted off the United Nations Human Rights Council amid mounting allegations of being responsible for war crimes in relation to its actions in Syria.
The 193-member General Assembly on Friday elected 14 members to the 47-nation council, the UN’s main body charged with promoting and protecting human rights.
Russia which received 112 votes lost its regional seat to Hungary, with 144 votes, and Croatia with 114 votes.
Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, China, Brazil, Rwanda, Hungary, Croatia, Cuba, South Africa, Japan, Tunisia, the US and UK - many of which have themselves been condemned for human rights abuses - all won seats on the council. Guatemala was the only country running for a seat beside Russia to not be elected.
Human rights groups had specifically called for countries to reject the candidacies of Russia and Saudi Arabia, which has been accused of indiscriminate attacks against civilians in Yemen. Saudi Arabia’s election, however, was a foregone conclusion since it was running unopposed for its regional seat.
“In rejecting Russia’s bid for re-election to the Human Rights Council, UN member states have sent a strong message to the Kremlin about its support for a regime that has perpetrated so much atrocity in Syria,” said Louis Charbonneau, UN director at Human Rights Watch.
“Next year, UN member states should make sure that all regional groups have real competition so no one is guaranteed victory.”
Britain’s Human Rights Minister Baroness Anelay said she was delighted with her country’s re-election to the council.
“The UK has been a strong advocate of the vital work of the Council since its inception, and we are honored to continue to serve as a member,” she said in statement.
The US and Russia have been in talks to try and bring an end to the fighting in Syria, that has led to the deaths of up to 500,000 deaths. Millions of people have fled, both internally and overseas, triggering a refugee crisis in Europe.
KUI see on tõsi, siis on juudid saanud Arrow näol valmis ülikõva ballistiliste rakettide vastase raketiga. Tabada lennul manööverdavat ÕT raketti on väga kõva sõna.siilike kirjutas:... Ainus tabamus - Arrow rakett tabas S-300 oma.