Militaarteemad minevikust kaasaega
https://militaar.net/phpBB2/
Iisraellaste Bibi võttis Zelenskiga juhtunust õppust ja määris Trumpile kulbiga mett moka peale.
Z ju ütles täpselt samad sõnad
Bibi pakub kuningriiki asukohaga Gaza sektor. Annab probleemi lahendamise vastutuse Stabiilsusele.Luderi kirjutas: ↑03 Mär, 2025 19:01Z ju ütles täpselt samad sõnad
Ainult et pärast seda nõuti talt poolt kuningriiki ja kapitulatsiooni. Kas ka Bibi'lt ?
Ehk siis, Bibi on hetkel meil Muutin Punn
https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/en/news ... ty-2702734Six elements are now key:
- Firstly, we must increase our German support for Ukraine once again – without delay.
I thus call on all democratic parties in the Bundestag to approve the blocked 3 billion euro in aid for Ukraine.
- Secondly, next Thursday, the European Council, the Heads of State and Government of the EU countries, will meet in Brussels.
Decisions must be taken there on a comprehensive European financial package for Ukraine, for humanitarian, economic and especially defence support.
– Thirdly, we must finally not only coordinate matters hand in hand with our close partners France, the UK and Poland, but must also take closely coordinated action. We must stand absolutely united. That is true as regards enhancing Ukrainian air defence, as well as for the delivery of long-range arms systems for defence purposes.
These three elements will help Ukraine continue to withstand Russia’s aggression, even without the announced US support – or the potential loss thereof – in order to achieve peace and not capitulation.
– Fourthly, our best defence against Putin’s aggression is united European strength. That alone will establish and safeguard peace in Europe.
If we fail to achieve this, Putin's forces might soon be in the Baltic region or even directly on the doorstep of our Polish neighbours. We cannot ignore this reality any longer.
At the European Council, therefore, decisions on massive investments are needed with regard to our common European defence capabilities, among other things.
That is why I am deeply committed to ensuring that the European Council takes appropriate action by increasing the flexibility of the Stability and Growth Pact.
For some countries that already have a high level of national debt and little leeway in their budgets, this will not be enough, however. As Europeans, we therefore should also discuss a European defence fund that reflects the gravity of these challenges.
But we cannot stop there. Further action will be necessary and will be taken in the coming months – both at the national and European level. We must send a powerful signal of European resolve no later than at the NATO Summit in The Hague.
- Fifthly, I believe this means that democrats in Germany need to come together to discuss the fundamental reform of the debt brake, as was already planned in the National Security Strategy as part of security considerations two and a half years ago.
I am aware that there is currently a discussion about creating another special fund. However, as experience has shown – since we already have a special fund – it is the less favourable option: it will not help Ukraine. And we cannot use it for all the aspects that are critical to our defence, such as countermeasures against hybrid attacks or cyber threats. In the Federal Government's National Security Strategy, we explicitly stated what this ongoing hybrid warfare means for our security. To be precise, hybrid attacks also aim to divide our free and democratic society. In other words, investments in our infrastructure, in the cohesion of our society, and in our democracy, are all in fact investments in our security, because Putin has reiterated in recent times that the objective of his hybrid warfare is also and specifically to sow division among the liberal and free societies in Europe.
- Sixthly, even though this may be the most heated moment since the end of the Cold War, we must continue to act with restraint and a cool head.
That means, among other things, that we will continue to regard investments in our European security to be investments in our transatlantic relations as well. A lasting peace for Ukraine is far more likely to be achieved with Washington rather than without it, let alone in opposition to it.
In all of this, we have no time to lose. We must now act quickly – both at the European and national level. We cannot afford to wait until a new Federal Government is formed, as the situation is serious.
Relvaabi on siis ametlikult läbi USA poolt.hjl85 kirjutas: ↑03 Mär, 2025 22:15 Trump peatas WSJ andmetel relvade myygi Ukrainale
https://x.com/polymarketintel/status/18 ... 45411?s=46
Segane asi. Postituses on jutt uute relvade müügi peatamisest. Laovarude andmise(mis on vist ka siiani põhiline USA relvaabi) peatamine on kaalumisel...hjl85 kirjutas: ↑03 Mär, 2025 22:15 Trump peatas WSJ andmetel relvade myygi Ukrainale
https://x.com/polymarketintel/status/18 ... 45411?s=46
Kogu EL-ile lubati 25% tariifi, nii et pole midagi uut.Trump ähvardab Ühendkuningriiki nüüd tariifidega – mõni päev pärast seda, kui oli Starmerile rääkinud kokkuleppest nende vältimiseks...
Ma sain jällegi ERR-i artiklist aru, et kogu abi pandi seisma, ka laovarude andmine.Segane asi. Postituses on jutt uute relvade müügi peatamisest. Laovarude andmise(mis on vist ka siiani põhiline USA relvaabi) peatamine on kaalumisel...
