
https://twitter.com/robinbrooksiif/stat ... xuy7OaVjLQ
EL diplomaatidel peaks nüüd tööd olema. Kõigepealt tuleb Kreeka (tõenäoliselt ka Küprose) valitsus ette võtta ja viidata kas ikka riik soovib täita EL seatud piiranguid. Järgmine etapp peaks Kreeka naftaveo piiranguid tutvustama Kreeka reederfirmadele ja nõuda seaduste täitmist. Vastasel juhul saab reederfirma ise trahvi.Gideonic kirjutas: ↑12 Juun, 2023 23:00 Vene naftat veavad suuresti laiali Kreeka tankerid![]()
https://twitter.com/robinbrooksiif/stat ... xuy7OaVjLQ
https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/06/12/ch ... ar-energy/China’s Big Gas Bet Raises Questions About Complicity With Russia
By Steven R. Miles, the fellow for global natural gas and energy transitions at Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, and Gabriel B. Collins, a fellow at the Center for Energy Studies at Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy and a senior visiting research fellow at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
JUNE 12, 2023, 5:04 PM
Chinese President Xi Jinping’s recent overtures to Ukraine and attempts to frame China as a neutral player and potential arbiter of peace between Russia and Ukraine shake the diplomatic landscape. The People’s Republic of China (PRC) has vehemently denied that Xi was informed in advance about the invasion plans and even asked Putin during his visit to delay the attack until after the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics. Yet suspicions remain about what the PRC knew and whether it used that knowledge to support Russia’s aims. Such suspicions may be well-founded, given the strategic interests that Eurasia’s two authoritarian titans share. A successful Russian revanchist conquest of Ukraine would be a powerful precedent for Beijing potentially using force against Taiwan.
We have uncovered data regarding the PRC’s energy activities that raise questions that support these suspicions. We have reviewed data from more than 600 discrete liquefied natural gas (LNG) purchase transactions worldwide over the past 18 years. They provide a quantifiable set of metrics that inform a more nuanced understanding of PRC interests and actions before and after Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Two key themes have emerged, neither of which have been publicly discussed to date.
First, Chinese LNG buyers stood out from every other group of global purchasers in the six months leading up to Russia’s invasion. From Sept. 1, 2021, through the end of February 2022, when Russia invaded Ukraine, almost a dozen PRC entities, including state-owned companies China National Offshore Oil Corp. (CNOOC), Sinopec, and Sinochem, bought more than 91 percent of all global LNG purchased worldwide under term deals (typically spanning four years or longer). These methane molecules came from projects that are either newly online or about to enter service, predominantly in the United States and Qatar.
Once the war started, PRC buyers continued to sign deals, accounting for 57 percent of worldwide term LNG purchases through April 2022 as others began to scramble for supplies. During the seven months from Sept. 1, 2021 to April 1, 2022, Chinese companies contracted for more than 23 million metric tons of LNG per year—more than twice what they had purchased in any prior full calendar year. For perspective, from 2006 (China’s first purchases in the dataset) through 2020, the PRC on average contracted for about 5 million metric tons per year of new LNG supplies annually and averaged only about 15 percent of new LNG procurement worldwide. In no year before 2021 did PRC entities acquire more than 9.1 mmtpa, or 45.7 percent, of total new supplies contracted for globally.
Unusually, Beijing’s LNG buying spree during this six month period was executed through 22 separate contracts signed by 11 different companies, all but one of which was owned by the PRC at either the national or local governmental level. Further, 9 of the 20 PRC entities in our dataset do not appear to have contracted for LNG prior to September 2021, and several of these (for instance, Shenzhen Gas, Sinopec, and SPIC) only contracted for LNG during the fourth quarter of 2021—when PRC buyers virtually monopolized global LNG procurement. Almost every contract during this pre-invasion buying spree was for a small quantity that, by itself, flew under the radar, but which together took most of the available near-term supplies off the market.
Second, this PRC monopsony soaked up near-term LNG supplies. Chinese buyers’ agreements with American, Qatari, and Russian suppliers (90 percent of total volumes contracted during the relevant period) were due to begin delivering gas within one to two years of signing. This contrasted with prior periods, in which PRC buyers would contract with new LNG projects that would not deliver gas for three to five years in most cases. Their shift toward near-term supplies thus raises questions on both the tactical and structural levels.
The context is critical. As the PRC was buying up almost all of the term LNG that would soon be available, Russian state-owned company Gazprom was reducing pipeline gas exports to Europe in 2021 and tightening the gas market. Gazprom, which owned roughly 25 percent of European gas storage capacity, left most of its storage in the EU close to empty for the winter of 2021-22.
...
Muud midagi,artikli alusel peaks Maksuamet ja Kaitsepolitsei toimetama kiire juurdluse ning selle järel tegema kopsakad trahvid koos skeemitamises süüdi olevate isikute vanglasse saatamisega nii paariks-kolmeks aastaks.lamba-ants kirjutas: ↑14 Juun, 2023 10:57 Dokumendid paljastavad Eesti ettevõtte salajase ärimudeli: Venemaa rikkuritele tarnitakse Saksamaa luksusautosid ja nende varuosi, kuigi see ei tohiks olla võimalik.
https://ekspress.delfi.ee/artikkel/1202 ... a-eliidini
Eesti firma aadress kohe nii ilusti näha dokumendi fotodes: Punane 14a, 319/3, Tallinn. Astuge lahkesti läbi, pakkuge suitsu.lamba-ants kirjutas: ↑14 Juun, 2023 10:57 Dokumendid paljastavad Eesti ettevõtte salajase ärimudeli: Venemaa rikkuritele tarnitakse Saksamaa luksusautosid ja nende varuosi, kuigi see ei tohiks olla võimalik.
https://ekspress.delfi.ee/artikkel/1202 ... a-eliidini
Parandagu mind need, kel aega guugeldada, aga kas mitte Kraft-Freia-Marabou polnud endise Philip Morrise tütarfirma Kraft Foodsi kaubamärgid, mis pärast Krafti poolitamist nüüd sellele samale Mondelezile kuuluvad?kaugeltuuriv kirjutas: ↑14 Juun, 2023 11:26 Panen siia magusateemat lisaks.Norra maiusetootja Freya on skandaali sattunud,kuna tema tütarettevõtted läbi skeemitamise jätkavad Venemaal tegutsemist.Tänu sellele,keeldus Norra Turismiliit lepingust nendega.Nimelt oli Liidul leping Freyaga,et müüa toodangut Turismiliidu infopunktides,Liidu lennujaamade müügipuntides ja ka nn.turismibutiikides.
Asi pandi nii suure kella külge,et kutsutakse selle firma toodangut üleriigiliselt boikottima.
Pilte stendidest.Putin’s Economic Forum Puts Russia’s Isolation on Display
Kasutajad foorumit lugemas: Registreeritud kasutajaid pole ja 6 külalist